Ultrasound examination of the pelvic floor during active labor: A longitudinal cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Eggebo, Torbjorn M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Benediktsdottir, Sigurlaug [4 ]
Hjartardottir, Hulda [4 ]
Salvesen, Kjell A. [1 ,2 ]
Volloyhaug, Ingrid [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, Natl Ctr Fetal Med, St Olavs Hosp, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Clin & Mol Med, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stavanger, Norway
[4] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Reykjavik, Iceland
[5] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
birth; fetal descent; head position; hiatal dimensions; injury; labor; levator ani; obstetrics; pelvic floor; prolapse; ultrasound; urogynecology; LEVATOR ANI MUSCLE; PUBORECTALIS MUSCLE; CESAREAN-SECTION; DELIVERY; PREGNANCY; AVULSION; ANATOMY; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14620
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionThere is limited evidence about changes in the pelvic floor during active labor. We aimed to investigate changes in hiatal dimensions during the active first stage of labor and associations with fetal descent and head position. Material and methodsWe conducted a longitudinal, prospective cohort study at the National University Hospital of Iceland, from 2016 to 2018. Nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor, a single fetus in cephalic presentation, and gestational age & GE;37 weeks were eligible. Fetal position was assessed with transabdominal ultrasound and fetal descent was measured with transperineal ultrasound. Three-dimensional volumes were acquired from transperineal scanning at the start of the active phase of labor and in late first stage or early second stage. The largest transverse hiatal diameter was measured in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. The levator urethral gap was measured as the distance between the center of the urethra and the levator insertion using tomographic ultrasound imaging. Measurements of the levator urethral gap were made in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions and 2.5 and 5 mm cranial to this. ResultsThe final study population comprised 78 women. The mean transverse hiatal diameter increased 12.4% between the two examinations, from 39.4 & PLUSMN; 4.1 mm (& PLUSMN;standard deviation) at the first examination to 44.3 & PLUSMN; 5.8 mm at the last examination (p < 0.01). We found a moderate correlation between the transverse hiatal diameter and fetal station at the last examination (r = 0.44, r(2) = 0.19; p < 0.01; regression equation y = 2.71 + 0.014x), and a weak correlation between the change in transverse hiatal diameter and change in fetal station (r = 0.29; r(2) = 0.08; p = 0.01; regression equation y = 0.24 + 0.012x). Levator urethral gap increased significantly in all three planes on both the left and right sides. Head position was not associated with hiatal measurements after adjusting for fetal station. ConclusionsWe found a significant, but only modest, increase of the hiatal dimensions during the first stage of labor. The risk of levator ani trauma will therefore be low during this stage. The change in transverse hiatal diameter was associated with fetal descent but not with head position.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1209
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and pelvic floor 3D-ultrasound assessment during pregnancy predicting urinary incontinence: a prospective cohort study
    Carlos Izaias Sartorao Filho
    Sthefanie K. Nunes
    Adriely B.M. Magyori
    Iracema M.P. Calderon
    Angelica M.P. Barbosa
    Marilza V.C. Rudge
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23
  • [22] Assessment of Perineal Scars on Translabial Pelvic Floor Ultrasound A Pilot Study
    Housmans, Susanne
    Gillor, Moshe
    Shek, Ka Lai
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (04) : 881 - 888
  • [23] Ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: changes in anatomy during and after first pregnancy
    van Veelen, G. A.
    Schweitzer, K. J.
    van der Vaart, C. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 44 (04) : 476 - 480
  • [24] Application of pelvic floor ultrasound during pregnancy to detect patients at risk of cesarean section due to failure of labor progression in a Spanish population
    Guntinas, Alicia
    Galocha, Carolina
    Madurga, Rodrigo
    Kirk, Janette
    Usandizaga, Ramon
    Angel Rodriguez-Zambrano, Miguel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 269 : 102 - 107
  • [25] Effect of childbirth on pelvic organ support and quality of life: a longitudinal cohort study
    Elenskaia, Ksenia
    Thakar, Ranee
    Sultan, Abdul H.
    Scheer, Inka
    Onwude, Joseph
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (06) : 927 - 937
  • [26] Pelvic floor muscle injury during a difficult labor. Can tissue fatigue damage play a role?
    Pouca, Maria C. P. Vila
    Parente, Marco P. L.
    Jorge, Renato M. Natal
    DeLancey, John O. L.
    Ashton-Miller, James A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (02) : 211 - 220
  • [27] Do we protect the pelvic floor with non-elective cesarean? A study of 3-D/4-D pelvic floor ultrasound immediately after delivery
    Aydin, Serdar
    Tuncel, Muazzez Ayca
    Aydin, Cagri Arioglu
    Ark, Cemal
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (04) : 1037 - 1045
  • [28] Ultrasound imaging measures of contraction characteristics of deep and superficial pelvic floor muscles differ during voluntary tasks
    Aljuraifani, Rafeef
    Stafford, Ryan E.
    Hodges, Paul W.
    CONTINENCE, 2025, 13
  • [29] The Efficacy of Divabirth Vaginal Dilator to Prevent Pelvic Floor Trauma During Labor: A Protocol Study
    Rahman, Muhammad Nurhadi
    Wilopo, Siswanto Agus
    Emilia, Ova
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY PROTOCOLS, 2022, 26 (01): : 88 - 93
  • [30] Pelvic floor muscle function, pelvic floor dysfunction and diastasis recti abdominis: Prospective cohort study
    Bo, Kari
    Hilde, Gunvor
    Tennfjord, Merete Kolberg
    Sperstad, Jorun Bakken
    Engh, Marie Ellstrom
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2017, 36 (03) : 716 - 721