Competencies for the Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools by Health Care Professionals

被引:86
作者
Russell, Regina G. [2 ]
Lovett Novak, Laurie [3 ]
Patel, Mehool [4 ,5 ]
Garvey, Kim V. [6 ,7 ]
Craig, Kelly Jean Thomas [8 ]
Jackson, Gretchen P. [4 ,9 ,10 ]
Moore, Don [2 ]
Miller, Bonnie M. [1 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, 2525 West End Ave,Room 1586, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Med Educ & Adm, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Biomed Informat, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[4] IBM Watson Hlth, Cambridge, MA USA
[5] Northeast Ohio Med Univ, Rootstown, OH USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[7] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Mobile Healthcare Learning, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[8] IBM Watson Hlth, Ctr Res & Evaluat, Cambridge, MA USA
[9] Intuit Surg, Sunnyvale, CA USA
[10] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Surg Pediat & Biomed Informat, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[11] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Med Educ & Adm, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[12] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Adv Mobile Healthcare Learning, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
MEDICAL-EDUCATION; SHIFT;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000004963
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposeThe expanded use of clinical tools that incorporate artificial intelligence (AI) methods has generated calls for specific competencies for effective and ethical use. This qualitative study used expert interviews to define AI-related clinical competencies for health care professionals. MethodIn 2021, a multidisciplinary team interviewed 15 experts in the use of AI-based tools in health care settings about the clinical competencies health care professionals need to work effectively with such tools. Transcripts of the semistructured interviews were coded and thematically analyzed. Draft competency statements were developed and provided to the experts for feedback. The competencies were finalized using a consensus process across the research team. ResultsSix competency domain statements and 25 subcompetencies were formulated from the thematic analysis. The competency domain statements are: (1) basic knowledge of AI: explain what AI is and describe its health care applications; (2) social and ethical implications of AI: explain how social, economic, and political systems influence AI-based tools and how these relationships impact justice, equity, and ethics; (3) AI-enhanced clinical encounters: carry out AI-enhanced clinical encounters that integrate diverse sources of information in creating patient-centered care plans; (4) evidence-based evaluation of AI-based tools: evaluate the quality, accuracy, safety, contextual appropriateness, and biases of AI-based tools and their underlying data sets in providing care to patients and populations; (5) workflow analysis for AI-based tools: analyze and adapt to changes in teams, roles, responsibilities, and workflows resulting from implementation of AI-based tools; and (6) practice-based learning and improvement regarding AI-based tools: participate in continuing professional development and practice-based improvement activities related to use of AI tools in health care. ConclusionsThe 6 clinical competencies identified can be used to guide future teaching and learning programs to maximize the potential benefits of AI-based tools and diminish potential harms.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 356
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Technology Can Augment, but Not Replace, Critical Human Skills Needed for Patient Care [J].
Alrassi, James ;
Katsufrakis, Peter J. ;
Chandran, Latha .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2021, 96 (01) :37-43
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ACGME common program requirements
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data in
[4]   A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 3-Using software for qualitative analysis [J].
Clarke, Samuel O. ;
Coates, Wendy C. ;
Jordan, Jaime .
AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2021, 5 (04)
[5]   A practical guide for conducting qualitative research in medical education: Part 2-Coding and thematic analysis [J].
Coates, Wendy C. ;
Jordan, Jaime ;
Clarke, Samuel O. .
AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2021, 5 (04)
[6]  
Crawford K., 2020, ATLAS AI POWER POLIT
[7]   Exploiting the power of information in medical education [J].
Cutrer, William B. ;
Spickard, W. Anderson, III ;
Triola, Marc M. ;
Allen, Bradley L. ;
Spell, Nathan, III ;
Herrine, Steven K. ;
Dalrymple, John L. ;
Gorman, Paul N. ;
Lomis, Kimberly D. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2021, 43 :S17-S24
[8]   The Case for Algorithmic Stewardship for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies [J].
Eaneff, Stephanie ;
Obermeyer, Ziad ;
Butte, Atul J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (14) :1397-1398
[9]   Toward a Common Taxonomy of Competency Domains for the Health Professions and Competencies for Physicians [J].
Englander, Robert ;
Cameron, Terri ;
Ballard, Adrian J. ;
Dodge, Jessica ;
Bull, Janet ;
Aschenbrener, Carol A. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2013, 88 (08) :1088-1094
[10]   The Clinician and Dataset Shift in Artificial Intelligence [J].
Finlayson, Samuel G. ;
Subbaswamy, Adarsh ;
Singh, Karandeep ;
Bowers, John ;
Kupke, Annabel ;
Zittrain, Jonathan ;
Kohane, Isaac S. ;
Saria, Suchi .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (03) :283-286