What factors affect species richness and distribution dynamics within two Afromontane protected areas?

被引:2
|
作者
Uzabaho, Eustrate [1 ]
Kayijamahe, Charles Birasa [1 ]
Musana, Abel [2 ]
Uwingeli, Prosper [2 ]
Masaba, Christopher [3 ]
Nyiratuza, Madeleine [4 ]
Moore, Jennifer Frances [5 ]
机构
[1] Int Gorilla Conservat Programme, POB 931, Kigali, Rwanda
[2] Volcanoes Natl Pk, Rwanda Dev Board, POB 6239, Kigali, Rwanda
[3] Mgahinga Gorilla Natl Pk, Uganda Wildlife Author, POB 3530, Kampala, Uganda
[4] United Nations Dev Programme, POB 445, Kigali, Rwanda
[5] Moore Ecol Anal & Management LLC, 3142 NW 12th St, Gainesville, FL 32609 USA
关键词
camera-trapping; occupancy models; Rwanda; species distribution; species richness; terrestrial mammals; Uganda; Virunga Massif; VOLCANOS NATIONAL-PARK; CAMERA TRAP DATA; MOUNTAIN GORILLAS; BIODIVERSITY; OCCUPANCY; DIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; WILDLIFE; REVEALS;
D O I
10.1071/WR21171
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context. Biodiversity monitoring programs provide information on the status and trends in wildlife populations. These trends are unknown for most mammals within African montane forests, which harbour many endemic and threatened species. Camera traps are useful for assessing mammal populations, because they allow for the estimation of species richness, occupancy, and activity patterns. Aims. We sought to explore the richness and distribution of small- to large-sized mammals by using occupancy models while accounting for imperfect detection in Volcanoes and Mgahinga Gorilla National Parks, in Rwanda and Uganda. Methods. We used camera-trap data collected from 2014 to 2017 by the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) network and multi-season occupancy models with multispecies data to assess the dynamics of species richness and distribution in the Virunga Massif and the influence of site covariates on species detection probability, occupancy, colonisation and extinction. Key results. We identified 17 species from 7047 trap-days, with most of them showing an uneven distributional pattern throughout the park. We found that average species richness per site increased from five to seven species in 2017. Average local colonisation was estimated at 0.13 (s.e. 0.014), but the probability of local extinction was 0.17 (s.e. 0.028) and negatively influenced by distance from the park boundary. Detection probability was highest for medium-sized species. For species distribution, we found that black-fronted duiker, Cephalophus nigrifrons, and bushbuck, Tragelaphus script us, declined in distribution but remained widespread in our study area, while all other species showed an increase in distribution over the study period. Conclusions, Our approach allowed us to draw inferences on rare species, such as African golden cat, Caracal aurata, by estimating detection probability on the basis of shared covariate information with more common, widespread species. As such, we were able to estimate all occupancy parameters across the terrestrial mammal community.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 424
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors affecting species richness and distribution spatially and temporally within a protected area using multi-season occupancy models
    Moore, J. F.
    Hines, J. E.
    Mulindahabi, F.
    Masozera, M. K.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 22 (05) : 503 - 514
  • [2] Species richness representation within protected areas is associated with multiple interacting spatial features
    Duran, America Paz
    Inger, Richard
    Cantu-Salazar, Lisette
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (03) : 300 - 308
  • [3] Statutory protected areas and avian species richness in Britain
    Jackson, Sarah F.
    Evans, Karl L.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2009, 18 (08) : 2143 - 2151
  • [4] What drives the spatial distribution and dynamics of local species richness in tropical forest?
    Wiegand, Thorsten
    May, Felix
    Kazmierczak, Martin
    Huth, Andreas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 284 (1863)
  • [5] Statutory protected areas and avian species richness in Britain
    Sarah F. Jackson
    Karl L. Evans
    Kevin J. Gaston
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2009, 18 : 2143 - 2151
  • [6] Distribution and representation of Crotalus species within the natural protected areas of Mexico
    Malinaly Paredes-Garcia, Dinorah
    Ramirez-Bautista, Aurelio
    Angel Martinez-Morales, Miguel
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE BIODIVERSIDAD, 2011, 82 (02) : 689 - 700
  • [7] Scale dependence of plant species richness in a network of protected areas
    Chiarucci, A.
    Bacaro, G.
    Filibeck, G.
    Landi, S.
    Maccherini, S.
    Scoppola, A.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2012, 21 (02) : 503 - 516
  • [8] Canadian private protected areas are located in regions of higher vertebrate species richness than government protected areas
    Custode, Leonardo B.
    Guzzo, Matthew M.
    Bush, Natasha
    Ewing, Claire
    Procko, Michael
    Knight, Samantha M.
    Rousseau-Clair, Marie-Michele
    Norris, D. Ryan
    FACETS, 2021, 6 : 1323 - 1336
  • [9] Mapping Potential Plant Species Richness over Large Areas with Deep Learning, MODIS, and Species Distribution Models
    Choe, Hyeyeong
    Chi, Junhwa
    Thorne, James H.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [10] Agroforestry systems reduce invasive species richness and diversity in the surroundings of protected areas
    Campos Cordeiro, Anais de Almeida
    Coelho, Sara Deambrozi
    Ramos, Nina Celli
    Alves Meira-Neto, Joao Augusto
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2018, 92 (06) : 1495 - 1505