Effectiveness and efficiency of telerehabilitation on functionality after spinal cord injury: A matched case-control study

被引:1
作者
Garcia-Rudolph, Alejandro [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wright, Mark Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yepes, Carlos [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Murillo, Narda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Conesa, Lucas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Soriano, Ignasi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bautista, Raquel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Opisso, Eloy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tormos, Josep Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Medina, Josep [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UAB, Dept Res & Innovat, Inst Guttmann, Inst Univ Neurorehabil Adscrit, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
[3] Fdn Inst Invest Ciencies Salut Germans Trias & Puj, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Hosp Neurorehabil, Dept Res & Innovat, Inst Guttmann, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
INDEPENDENCE MEASURE SCIM; LENGTH-OF-STAY; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; VERSION III; INDIVIDUALS; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; OUTCOMES; STROKE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.13125
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BackgroundTelerehabilitation in spinal cord injury (teleSCI) is a growing field that can improve access to care and health outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The clinical effectiveness of teleSCI is not known.ObjectivesTo compare independence in activities of daily living and mobility capacity in patients following teleSCI and matched controls undergoing traditional rehabilitation.DesignMatched case-control study.SettingTeleSCI occurring in home setting (cases) versus traditional rehabilitation on inpatient unit (controls).ParticipantsForty-two consecutive patients with SCI followed with teleSCI were compared to 42 historical rehabilitation inpatients (controls) matched for age, time since injury to rehabilitation admission, level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), complete or incomplete injury, and etiology (traumatic/nontraumatic). The teleSCI group (n = 42) was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n = 613).InterventionsThe teleSCI group followed home-based telerehabilitation (3.5 h/day, 5 days/week, 67 days average duration) and historical controls followed in-person rehabilitation.Main Outcome Measure(s)The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). We formally compared gains, efficiency and effectiveness. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) were used.ResultsThe teleSCI group (57.1% nontraumatic, 71.4% paraplegia, 73.8% incomplete, 52.4% AIS grade D) showed no significant differences compared with historical controls in AIS grades, neurological levels, duration, gains, efficiency and effectiveness in FIM, SCIM, or WISCI, although the teleSCI cohort had significantly higher admission FIM scores compared with the complete cohort of historical controls.ConclusionsTeleSCI may provide similar improvements in mobility and functional outcomes as traditional rehabilitation in medically stable patients (predominantly with paraplegia and motor incomplete SCI) when provided with appropriate support and equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 825
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Alexander M., ISCOS 2016 WORKSH
[2]   Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury following inpatient rehabilitation: A systematic review [J].
AlHuthaifi, Faisal ;
Krzak, Joseph ;
Hanke, Timothy ;
Vogel, Lawrence C. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (03) :282-294
[3]   Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research - Functional recovery outcome measures work group [J].
Anderson, Kim ;
Aito, Sergio ;
Atkins, Michal ;
Biering-Sorensen, Fin ;
Charlifue, Susan ;
Curt, Armin ;
Ditunno, John ;
Glass, Clive ;
Marino, Ralph ;
Marshall, Ruth ;
Mulcahey, Mary Jane ;
Post, Marcel ;
Savic, Gordana ;
Scivoletto, Giorgio ;
Catz, Amiram .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2008, 31 (02) :133-144
[4]  
[Anonymous], MATCHIT NONPARAMETRI
[5]  
Atanelov Levan, 2015, AMA J Ethics, V17, P568, DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.6.mhst1-1506
[6]   Change in the profile of traumatic spinal cord injury over 15 years in Spain [J].
Barbara-Bataller, Enrique ;
Mendez-Suarez, Jose Luis ;
Aleman-Sanchez, Carolina ;
Sanchez-Enriquez, Jesus ;
Sosa-Henriquez, Manuel .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 26
[7]   The experience of using the scale of Functional Independence Measure in individuals undergoing spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Brazil [J].
Barbetta, D. C. ;
Cassemiro, L. C. ;
Assis, M. R. .
SPINAL CORD, 2014, 52 (04) :276-281
[8]   Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide [J].
Bovend'Eerdt, Thamar J. H. ;
Botell, Rachel E. ;
Wade, Derick T. .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 23 (04) :352-361
[9]   The effect of the introduction of a case-mix-based funding model of rehabilitation for severe stroke: An Australian experience [J].
Brock, Kim A. ;
Vale, Stephen J. ;
Cotton, Susan M. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 88 (07) :827-832
[10]   A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III:: Rasch psychometric validation [J].
Catz, A. ;
Itzkovich, M. ;
Tesio, L. ;
Biering-Sorensen, F. ;
Weeks, C. ;
Laramee, M. T. ;
Craven, B. C. ;
Tonack, M. ;
Hitzig, S. L. ;
Glaser, E. ;
Zeilig, G. ;
Aito, S. ;
Scivoletto, G. ;
Mecci, M. ;
Chadwick, R. J. ;
El Masry, W. S. ;
Osman, A. ;
Glass, C. A. ;
Silva, P. ;
Zeilig, G. ;
Aito, S. ;
Scivoletto, G. ;
Mecci, M. ;
Chadwick, R. J. ;
El Masry, W. S. ;
Osman, A. ;
Glass, C. A. ;
Silva, P. ;
Soni, B. M. ;
Gardner, B. P. ;
Savic, G. ;
Bergstrom, E. M. ;
Bluvshtein, V. ;
Ronen, J. .
SPINAL CORD, 2007, 45 (04) :275-291