Midline lumbar interbody fusion: a review of the surgical technique and outcomes

被引:4
作者
Alentado, Vincent J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mobasser, Dillon [2 ]
Mobasser, Jean-Pierre [2 ,3 ]
Potts, Eric A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Goodman Campbell Brain & Spine, Carmel, IN 46032 USA
[3] Ascens St Vincent Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
minimally invasive; lumbar; spine; surgery; BONE TRAJECTORY SCREW; CONVENTIONAL PEDICLE SCREW; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; CORTICAL SCREW; FIXATION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;
D O I
10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23353
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Midline lumbar interbody fusion (MidLIF) is a mini-open posterior interbody fusion technique defined by a cortical screw trajectory wherein screws are placed from a more medial to lateral trajectory compared with traditional pedicle screws. This enables the surgeon to perform a smaller muscle dissection with the benefits of improved blood loss, less muscle retraction, decreased operative time, shorter length of stay, and improved back pain outcomes compared with the traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques utilizing pedicle screw fixation. Importantly, MidLIF offers comparable clinical outcomes and radiographic outcomes to other posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques. In the current review, the authors aimed to educate readers about the MidLIF surgical technique, as well as surgical, clinical, radiographic, cost effectiveness, and biomechanical outcomes, when compared with both open and minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques with pedicle screw fixation. Readers will be able to utilize this information to determine how the MidLIF procedure compares as an alternative to traditional techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 470
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis [J].
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Macki, Mohamed ;
Abt, Nicholas B. ;
Witham, Timothy F. ;
Wolinsky, Jean-Paul ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Bydon, Ali ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (03) :492-498
[2]   Anatomical differences in the bony structure of L5 and L4: A possible classification according to the lateral tilt of the pedicles [J].
Cacciola, Giorgio ;
Anastasi, Giuseppe ;
Bertino, Salvatore ;
Rizzo, Giuseppina ;
Cutroneo, Giuseppina ;
Trimarchi, Fabio ;
Pisani, Alessandro ;
Cavaliere, Pietro ;
Barbanera, Andrea ;
Bruschetta, Daniele .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 15 (01) :205-209
[3]   Minimally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion [J].
Crawford, Charles H., III ;
Owens, Roger K., II ;
Djurasovic, Mladen ;
Gum, Jeffrey L. ;
Dimar, John R., II ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
HELIYON, 2019, 5 (09)
[4]   Cortical Trajectory Fixation Versus Traditional Pedicle-Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Patients with Osteoporosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Ding, Hongtao ;
Hai, Yong ;
Liu, Yuzeng ;
Guan, Li ;
Pan, Aixing ;
Zhang, Xinuo ;
Han, Bo ;
Li, Yue ;
Yin, Peng .
CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2022, 17 :175-184
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive midline lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Djurasovic, Mladen ;
Gum, Jeffrey L. ;
Crawford, Charles H., III ;
Owens, Kirk, II ;
Brown, Morgan ;
Steele, Portia ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (01) :31-35
[6]   Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Three Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Fusion Techniques for Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimally Invasive Surgical Posterolateral Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Midline Lumbar Fusion [J].
Elmekaty, Mohamed ;
Kotani, Yoshihisa ;
El Mehy, Emad ;
Robinson, Yohan ;
El Tantawy, Ahmed ;
Sekiguchi, Ivan ;
Fujita, Ryo .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (05) :870-879
[7]   May the midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) prevent the early radiographic adjacent segment degeneration? A minimum 3-year follow-up comparative study of MIDLIF in L4/5 with cortical bone trajectory screw versus traditional pedicle screw fixation [J].
Han, Bo ;
Ding, Hongtao ;
Hai, Yong ;
Liu, Yuzeng ;
Guan, Li ;
Pan, Aixing ;
Zhang, Xinuo ;
Yin, Peng .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
[8]   Comparison of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement Using the Midline Lumbar Fusion Technique to Traditional Pedicle Screws: A Case-Control Study [J].
Hoffman, Haydn ;
Verhave, Brendon ;
Jalal, Muhammad S. ;
Beutler, Timothy ;
Galgano, Michael A. ;
Chin, Lawrence S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 13 (01) :33-38
[9]   Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory [J].
Hung, Che-Wei ;
Wu, Ming-Fang ;
Hong, Rong-Tsan ;
Weng, Mei-Jui ;
Yu, Gwo-Fane ;
Kao, Cheng-Hsing .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 145 :41-45
[10]   Surgical Invasiveness of Single-Segment Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparing Perioperative Blood Loss in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Traditional Pedicle Screws, Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws, and Percutaneous Pedicle Screws [J].
Inoue, Tetsuji ;
Mizutamari, Masaya ;
Hatake, Kuniaki .
ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (06) :856-864