Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial

被引:2
作者
Irazola, Vilma [1 ]
Santero, Marilina [1 ]
Sanchez, Mario [2 ]
Tristao, Ignez [2 ]
Ruiz, Juan Ignacio [3 ]
Spira, Cintia [3 ]
Ismael, Julia [4 ]
Cavallo, Ana Soledad [1 ]
Gutierrez, Laura [1 ]
Mazzaresi, Yanina [5 ]
Nadal, Ana Maria [5 ]
Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy, Dept Res Chron Dis, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Social Protect & Hlth Div, Social Sect, IADB, Washington, DC USA
[3] Inst Clin Effectiveness & Hlth Policy, Dept Qual & Patient Safety, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Inst Nacl Canc, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Minist Hlth, Mendoza, Argentina
关键词
Ambulatory care; Chronic disease management; Cluster trials; Healthcare quality improvement; Primary care; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country. Methods We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers and catalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy. Results Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was 5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups. Conclusions An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina's primary care setting within the public healthcare system.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Abriata MG., 2015, ATLAS MORTALIDAD C A
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, PROGRAMA NACL PREVEN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, REPORTE MONITOREO PR
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, TERCERA ENCUESTA NAC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, CANC COLORRECTAL ARG
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, NOMINAL GROUP TECHNI
  • [7] Using a Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative to Improve Access in Primary Care
    Boushon, Barbara
    Provost, Lloyd
    Gagnon, Janice
    Carver, Penny
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2006, 32 (10) : 573 - 584
  • [8] Espinola N., 2016, ACTA GASTROEN LATAM, V46, P8
  • [9] Estadisticas vitales, 2019, ESTADISTICAS VITALES
  • [10] Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Soerjomataram, Isabelle
    Dikshit, Rajesh
    Eser, Sultan
    Mathers, Colin
    Rebelo, Marise
    Parkin, Donald Maxwell
    Forman, David
    Bray, Freddie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) : E359 - E386