A Belgian Population-Based Study Reveals Subgroups of Right-sided Colorectal Cancer with a Better Prognosis Compared to Left-sided Cancer

被引:1
作者
Janssens, Katleen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fransen, Erik [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Van Camp, Guy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Prenen, Hans [3 ]
Op de Beeck, Ken [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Van Damme, Nancy [5 ]
Peeters, Marc [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Med Genet, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43, Edegem, Belgium
[2] Antwerp Univ Hosp, Prins Boudewijnlaan 43, Edegem, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Ctr Oncol Res CORE, Univ Pl 1, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Antwerp, StatUa Ctr Stat, Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Belgian Canc Registry, Koningsstr 215, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Wilrijkstr 10, Edegem, Belgium
关键词
colorectal neoplasms; tumor biomarkers; survival; population register; primary tumor location; PRIMARY TUMOR LOCATION; COLON-CANCER; MOLECULAR-FEATURES; SURVIVAL; STAGE; METASTASES; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Patients with left-sided colorectal cancer (L-CRC) are known to have a significantly better prognosis than those with right-sided CRC (R-CRC). It has been hypothesized that RAS, BRAF mutations, or deficient mismatch repair status (MMR) might be responsible for the prognostic effect of primary tumor location (PTL). This study aims to evaluate the prognostic effect of PTL in the Belgian population and to determine the role of biomarkers (MMR, BRAF, and RAS status) in this effect. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of Belgian Cancer Registry data. First, we studied the prognostic effect of PTL on 5-year relative survival of 91,946 patients diagnosed with CRC (all stages) from 2004-2015. Second, we investigated the interaction between biomarkers and the prognostic effect of PTL in 1818 patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC in 2014-2015. Results: L-CRC was associated with a significantly better 5-year relative survival compared to R-CRC in all stages and ages combined (68.4%, 95% CI, 67.7-69.1% vs 65.6%, 95% CI, 64.7-66.4%). Also, when stratified by age, sex, and stage, the prognosis of L-CRC was better compared to R-CRC in most subgroups. Only in stage II and certain subgroups of elderly patients, the opposite was observed. Furthermore, our data showed that none of the biomarkers had a significant interaction with the effect of PTL on survival. Conclusion: This population-based study confirms that L-CRC is associated with significantly better relative survival compared to R-CRC, in all stages and ages combined. Furthermore, in stage IV L-CRC is associated with a longer survival than R-CRC, regardless of MMR, RAS, and BRAF status.
引用
收藏
页码:E331 / E340
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of histologic subtypes in the right-sided colon cancer
    Zenger, Serkan
    Gurbuz, Bulent
    Can, Ugur
    Balik, Emre
    Bugra, Dursun
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (05): : 2154 - 2159
  • [42] Oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer: a population-based study
    Bernhoff, Richard
    Sjovall, Annika
    Granath, Fredrik
    Holm, Torbjorn
    Martling, Anna
    Buchli, Christian
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (06) : 1404 - 1413
  • [43] Prognostic value of total number of lymph nodes retrieved differs between left-sided colon cancer and right-sided colon cancer in stage III patients with colon cancer
    Yang, Lin
    Xiong, Zhenchong
    Xie, Qiankun
    He, Wenzhuo
    Liu, Shousheng
    Kong, Pengfei
    Jiang, Chang
    Guo, Guifang
    Xia, Liangping
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [44] Differences in colorectal cancer patterns between right and left sided colorectal cancer lesions
    Pappas, A. V.
    Lagoudianakis, E. E.
    Dallianoudis, I. G.
    Kotzadimitriou, K. T.
    Koronakis, N. E.
    Chrysikos, I. D.
    Koukoutsi, I. D.
    Markogiannakis, H. E.
    Antonakis, P. T.
    Manouras, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2010, 15 (03): : 509 - 513
  • [45] Molecular Differences between Hepatic and Extrahepatic Metastases from Left-Sided and Right-Sided Colorectal Cancer: Potential Metastatic and Prognostic Biomarkers
    Yuan, Meiqin
    Fang, Jianfei
    Wang, Li
    Chen, Rongrong
    Zhong, Haijun
    Pan, Hongming
    Lv, Wangxia
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2023, 37 (11) : 5817 - 5827
  • [46] Change in abdominal obesity after colon cancer surgery - effects of left-sided and right-sided colonic resection
    Ali, Younes Kays Mohammed
    Dolin, Troels Gammeltoft
    Nybing, Janus Damm
    Lykke, Jakob
    Linden, Frederik Hvid
    Hogh-Schmidt, Erik
    Sorensen, Thorkild I. A.
    Christensen, Jesper Frank
    Nielsen, Yousef J. W.
    Larsen, Jim Stenfatt
    Madsbad, Sten
    Johansen, Julia Sidenius
    Svane, Maria Saur
    Lehrskov, Louise Lang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2024, 48 (04) : 533 - 541
  • [47] Proteomic Profiling and Tumor Microenvironment Characterization Reveal Molecular and Immunological Hallmarks of Left-Sided and Right-Sided Colon Cancer Tumorigenesis
    Hong, Zhu
    Wang, Tao
    Wang, Wei
    Jing, Haoren
    Tang, Hongzhen
    Xu, Mingyue
    Pan, Chaohu
    Mu, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Di
    Gao, Guochao
    Gao, Zihe
    Luo, Haitao
    Zhou, Yi
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2023, 22 (09) : 2973 - 2984
  • [48] Colorectal adenocarcinoma in Uganda: are right-sided and left-sided colon cancers two distinct disease entities?
    Richard Wismayer
    Julius Kiwanuka
    Henry Wabinga
    Michael Odida
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 21
  • [49] Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17
    Brule, S. Y.
    Jonker, D. J.
    Karapetis, C. S.
    O'Callaghan, C. J.
    Moore, M. J.
    Wong, R.
    Tebbutt, N. C.
    Underhill, Cr.
    Yip, D.
    Zalcberg, J. R.
    Tu, D.
    Goodwin, R. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (11) : 1405 - 1414
  • [50] Immunological Differences Between Right-Sided and Left-Sided Colorectal Cancers: A Comparison of Embryologic Midgut and Hindgut
    Kwak, Han Deok
    Ju, Jae Kyun
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 35 (06) : 342 - 346