Remote monitoring of atrial fibrillation recurrence using mHealth technology (REMOTE-AF)

被引:5
作者
Adasuriya, Gamith [1 ]
Barsky, Andrey [2 ,3 ]
Kralj-Hans, Ines [1 ]
Mohan, Siddhartha [1 ]
Gill, Simrat [2 ]
Chen, Zhong [1 ]
Jarman, Julian [1 ]
Jones, David [1 ]
Valli, Haseeb [1 ]
Gkoutos, Georgios, V [2 ,3 ]
Markides, Vias [1 ]
Hussain, Wajid [1 ]
Wong, Tom [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Kotecha, Dipak [2 ,6 ]
Haldar, Shouvik [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hosp, Heart Rhythm Ctr, Hill End Rd, London UB9 6JH, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Hlth Data Res UK Midlands & NIHR Birmingham Biomed, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Inst Canc & Genom Sci, Birmingham, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[5] Kings Coll Hosp London, London, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Birmingham, England
来源
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
Remote monitoring; Wearables; Atrial fibrillation; Digital health; Ablation; SMARTWATCH; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1093/ehjdh/ztae011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims This proof-of-concept study sought to evaluate changes in heart rate (HR) obtained from a consumer wearable device and compare against implantable loop recorder (ILR)-detected recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT) after AF ablation.Methods and results REMOTE-AF (NCT05037136) was a prospectively designed sub-study of the CASA-AF randomized controlled trial (NCT04280042). Participants without a permanent pacemaker had an ILR implanted at their index ablation procedure for longstanding persistent AF. Heart rate and step count were continuously monitored using photoplethysmography (PPG) from a commercially available wrist-worn wearable. Photoplethysmography-recorded HR data were pre-processed with noise filtration and episodes at 1-min interval over 30 min of HR elevations (Z-score = 2) were compared with corresponding ILR data. Thirty-five patients were enrolled, with mean age 70.3 +/- 6.8 years and median follow-up 10 months (interquartile range 8-12 months). Implantable loop recorder analysis revealed 17 out of 35 patients (49%) had recurrence of AF/AT. Compared with ILR recurrence, wearable-derived elevations in HR >= 110 beats per minute had a sensitivity of 95.3%, specificity 54.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) 15.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) 99.2%, and overall accuracy 57.4%. With PPG-recorded HR elevation spikes (non-exercise related), the sensitivity was 87.5%, specificity 62.2%, PPV 39.2%, NPV 92.3%, and overall accuracy 64.0% in the entire patient cohort. In the AF/AT recurrence only group, sensitivity was 87.6%, specificity 68.3%, PPV 53.6%, NPV 93.0%, and overall accuracy 75.0%.Conclusion Consumer wearable devices have the potential to contribute to arrhythmia detection after AF ablation.Study Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05037136 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05037136 Graphical Abstract Aims, methods, and findings for REMOTE-AF looking at the detection of AF/AT recurrence using novel composite data from wearables compared with gold standard ILR. AF, atrial fibrillation; AT, atrial tachycardia; HR, heart rate; ILR, implantable loop recorder; LSPAF, long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 355
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Adasuriya G., 2022, EUR J ARRHYTHM ELECT, V8, P7, DOI [10.17925/EJAE.2022.8.1.7, DOI 10.17925/EJAE.2022.8.1.7]
  • [2] Smartphone ECG Monitoring System Helps Lower Emergency Room and Clinic Visits in Post-Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Patients
    Aljuaid, Mossab
    Marashly, Qussay
    AlDanaf, Jad
    Tawhari, Ibrahim
    Barakat, Michel
    Barakat, Rody
    Zobell, Brittany
    Cho, William
    Chelu, Mihail G.
    Marrouche, Nassir F.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 14
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation screening in Canadian community practice
    Andrade, Jason G.
    Shah, Anshul
    Godin, Richard
    Lanitis, Tereza
    Kongnakorn, Thitima
    Brown, Lauren
    Dhanda, Devender
    Dhamane, Amol
    Nault, Isabelle
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM O2, 2023, 4 (02): : 103 - 110
  • [4] Betts T, 2023, CONTINUOUS RHYTHM MO
  • [5] NICE atrial fibrillation guideline snubs wearable technology: a missed opportunity?
    Briosa e Gala, Andre
    Pope, Michael T. B.
    Leo, Milena
    Lobban, Trudie
    Betts, Timothy R.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [6] Castaneda Denisse, 2018, Int J Biosens Bioelectron, V4, P195, DOI 10.15406/ijbsbe.2018.04.00125
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Atrial Fibrillation Using Wearable Devices
    Chen, Wanyi
    Khurshid, Shaan
    Singer, Daniel E.
    Atlas, Steven J.
    Ashburner, Jeffrey M.
    Ellinor, Patrick T.
    McManus, David D.
    Lubitz, Steven A.
    Chhatwal, Jagpreet
    [J]. JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2022, 3 (08): : E222419
  • [8] Chokesuwattanaskul R., 2019, J BIOMED SCI ENG, V12, P391, DOI DOI 10.4236/JBISE.2019.128030
  • [9] Comparison of Arrhythmia Detection by 24-Hour Holter and 14-Day Continuous Electrocardiography Patch Monitoring
    Chua, Su-Kiat
    Chen, Lung-Ching
    Lien, Li-Ming
    Lo, Huey-Ming
    Liao, Zhen-Yu
    Chao, Shu-Ping
    Chuang, Cheng-Yen
    Chiu, Chiung-Zuan
    [J]. ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 36 (03) : 251 - 259
  • [10] Detection of atrial fibrillation using an earlobe photoplethysmographic sensor
    Conroy, Thomas
    Guzman, Jairo Hernandez
    Hall, Burr
    Tsouri, Gill
    Couderc, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 38 (10) : 1906 - 1918