Mitigation of gaseous emissions from dairy livestock: A farm-level method to examine the financial implications

被引:6
作者
Cantillon, M. [1 ,2 ]
Hennessy, T. [2 ]
Amon, B. [3 ,4 ]
Dragoni, F. [3 ]
O'Brien, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johnstown Castle Co, Teagasc, Crops, Environm & Land Use Res Ctr, Wexford, Ireland
[2] Cork Univ, Univ Coll Cork, Business Sch, Coll Rd, Cork, Ireland
[3] Leibniz Inst Agr Engn & Bioecon ATB, Max Eyth Allee 100, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[4] Univ Zielona Gora, Fac Civil Engn Architecture & Environm Engn, Zielona Gora, Poland
关键词
Farm; -specific; Marginal abatement cost curve; Greenhouse gas; Ammonia; Climate change; Financial impact; ABATEMENT COST CURVES; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; AMMONIA EMISSIONS; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119904
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Feeding the world's population while minimising the contribution of agriculture to climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing modern society. This challenge is particularly pronounced for dairy production where the carbon footprint of products and the mitigation costs are high, relative to other food stuffs. This paper reviews a number of mitigation measures that may be adopted by dairy farmers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from their farms. A simulation model is developed to assess the cost-benefit of a range of mitigation measures. The model is applied to data from Ireland, a country with a large export-oriented dairy industry, for a range of farms including top, middle and bottom performing farms from a profitability perspective. The mitigation measures modelled included animal productivity, grass production and utilisation, better reproductive performance, early compact calving, reduced crude protein, decreased fertiliser N, protected urea, white clover, slurry tank cover and low emission slurry spreading (LESS). The results show that over half of the greenhouse gas abatement potential and most of the ammonia abatement potential were realised with cost-beneficial measures. Animal and feed-related measures that increased efficiency drove the abatement of GHG emissions. Lowemission slurry spreading was beneficial for the bottom and middle one-third of farms, while protected urea and reducing nitrogen use accounted for most of the ammonia abatement potential for the most profitable farms. Results showed that combining mitigation measures resulted in a decrease of 23%, 19%, and 12% in GHG emissions below 2020 levels for the bottom, middle, and top performing dairy farms, respectively. The findings imply that top dairy farms, that are already managed efficiently and optimally, may struggle to achieve the national and international GHG reduction targets with existing technologies and practices.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Developing farm-specific marginal abatement cost curves: Cost-effective greenhouse gas mitigation opportunities in sheep farming systems [J].
Jones, A. K. ;
Jones, D. L. ;
Cross, P. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 49 :394-403
[32]  
Lanigan G., 2019, An Analysis of Abatement Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Irish Agriculture 2021-2030
[33]  
Ma R, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-25854-3
[34]   Developing greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curves for agricultural emissions from crops and soils in the UK [J].
MacLeod, Michael ;
Moran, Dominic ;
Eory, Vera ;
Rees, R. M. ;
Barnes, Andrew ;
Topp, Cairistiona F. E. ;
Ball, Bruce ;
Hoad, Steve ;
Wall, Eileen ;
McVittie, Alistair ;
Pajot, Guillaume ;
Matthews, Robin ;
Smith, Pete ;
Moxey, Andrew .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (04) :198-209
[35]   An evaluation of the effect of greenhouse gas accounting methods on a marginal abatement cost curve for Irish agricultural greenhouse gas emissions [J].
O'Brien, Donal ;
Shalloo, Laurence ;
Crosson, Paul ;
Donnellan, Trevor ;
Farrelly, Niall ;
Finnan, John ;
Hanrahan, Kevin ;
Lalor, Stan ;
Lanigan, Gary ;
Thorne, Fiona ;
Schulte, Rogier .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 39 :107-118
[36]   Ruminant grassland production systems in Ireland [J].
O'Donovan, M. ;
Hennessy, D. ;
Creighton, P. .
IRISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2021, 59 (02) :225-232
[37]  
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/FAO, 2021, OECD FAO AGR OUTLOOK
[38]   Identifying cost-competitive greenhouse gas mitigation potential of French agriculture [J].
Pellerin, Sylvain ;
Bamiere, Laure ;
Angers, Denis ;
Beline, Fabrice ;
Benoit, Marc ;
Butault, Jean-Pierre ;
Chenu, Claire ;
Colnenne-David, Caroline ;
De Cara, Stephane ;
Delame, Nathalie ;
Doreau, Michel ;
Dupraz, Pierre ;
Faverdin, Philippe ;
Garcia-Launay, Florence ;
Hassouna, Melynda ;
Henault, Catherine ;
Jeuffroy, Marie-Helene ;
Klumpp, Katja ;
Metay, Aurelie ;
Moran, Dominic ;
Recous, Sylvie ;
Samson, Elisabeth ;
Savini, Isabelle ;
Pardon, Lenaic ;
Chemineau, Philippe .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2017, 77 :130-139
[39]  
Peyraud J, 2020, Final report, DOI DOI 10.2762/3440
[40]  
Reis S., 2015, Costs of ammonia abatement and the climate co-benefits, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-9722-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9722-1_2]