Outcomes of a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for elective, periprocedural support of high-risk percutaneous cardiac interventions: An experience from a latinamerican center

被引:4
作者
Bulnes, Juan F. [1 ]
Martinez, Alejandro [1 ]
Sepulveda, Pablo [1 ]
Fuensalida, Alberto [1 ]
Besa, Santiago [2 ]
Garrido, Luis [2 ]
Martinez, Gonzalo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catol, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Santiago, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catol, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Santiago, Chile
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Med, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Head Intervent Cardiol, Diagonal Paraguay 362,7th floor, Santiago, Chile
来源
PERFUSION-UK | 2024年 / 39卷 / 05期
关键词
CHIP; high-risk interventions; protected PCI; protected TAVR; mechanical support; ECMO; VA-ECMO; CORONARY INTERVENTION; CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT; HEMODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1177/02676591231178413
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology include a wide spectrum of clinical and anatomical scenarios related to a higher periprocedural morbidity and mortality. The prophylactic use of short-term mechanical circulatory support (ST-MCS) may improve both the safety and efficacy of the intervention by leading to more stable procedural hemodynamics. However, the significant costs may limit its use in resource constrained settings. To overcome this limitation, we ideated a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (V-A ECMO) setup. Methods We conducted an observational prospective study including all patients undergoing a high-risk interventional cardiology procedure at our institution under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost version of V-A ECMO, where some components of the standard V-A ECMO circuit were replaced by supplies used for cardiac surgical cardiopulmonary bypass, achieving a cost reduction of 72%. We assessed in-hospital and mid-term outcomes, including procedural success, post-procedure complications and mortality. Results Between March 2016 and December 2021, ten patients underwent high-risk IC procedures with prophylactic use of V-A ECMO. Isolated percutaneous intervention (PCI) was performed in six patients, isolated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in two, and a combined procedure (PCI + TAVR) in two. Mean ejection fraction was 34% (range 20-64%). Mean STS PROM was 16.2% (range 9.5-35.8%) and mean EuroScore was 23.7% (range 1.5-60%). The planned intervention was successfully performed in all cases. There were no reports of V-A ECMO malfunction. In nine patients the VA-ECMO was withdrawn immediately after the procedure but one patient required extended - 24 h - support with no significant issues. One patient experienced a periprocedural myocardial infarction and another developed a femoral pseudoaneurysm. In-hospital and 30-day survival were 100%, and 1-year survival was 80%. Conclusions High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology can be successfully performed under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost V-A ECMO, suitable for limited-resource settings.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1005
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
Ott R A, 1990, ASAIO Trans, V36, pM483
[12]   Acute changes of left ventricular hemodynamics and function during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease [J].
Park, Seong-Mi ;
Ahn, Chul-Min ;
Hong, Soon-Jun ;
Kim, Yong-Hyun ;
Park, Jae-Hyoung ;
Shim, Wan-Joo ;
Lim, Do-Sun .
HEART AND VESSELS, 2015, 30 (04) :432-440
[13]   Elective Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Perera, Divaka ;
Stables, Rodney ;
Thomas, Martyn ;
Booth, Jean ;
Pitt, Michael ;
Blackman, Daniel ;
de Belder, Adam ;
Redwood, Simon .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (08) :867-874
[14]   In-hospital outcomes after emergency or prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive review of the literature [J].
Raffa, Giuseppe M. ;
Kowalewski, Mariusz ;
Meani, Paolo ;
Follis, Fabrizio ;
Martucci, Gennaro ;
Arcadipane, Antonio ;
Pilato, Michele ;
Maessen, Jos ;
Lorusso, Roberto .
PERFUSION-UK, 2019, 34 (05) :354-363
[15]   2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care [J].
Rihal, Charanjit S. ;
Naidu, Srihari S. ;
Givertz, Michael M. ;
Szeto, Wilson Y. ;
Burke, James A. ;
Kapur, Navin K. ;
Kern, Morton ;
Garratt, Kirk N. ;
Goldstein, James A. ;
Dimas, Vivian ;
Tu, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (19) :E7-E26
[16]   Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Very High-risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [J].
Seco, Michael ;
Forrest, Paul ;
Jackson, Simon A. ;
Martinez, Gonzalo ;
Andvik, Sarah ;
Bannon, Paul G. ;
Ng, Martin ;
Fraser, John F. ;
Wilson, Michael K. ;
Vallely, Michael P. .
HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2014, 23 (10) :957-962
[17]  
Shaukat A, 2018, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V30, P456
[18]   PROPHYLACTIC VERSUS STANDBY CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT FOR HIGH-RISK PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
TEIRSTEIN, PS ;
VOGEL, RA ;
DORROS, G ;
STERTZER, SH ;
VANDORMAEL, MG ;
SMITH, SC ;
OVERLIE, PA ;
ONEILL, WW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 21 (03) :590-596
[19]   Outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for complex high-risk elective percutaneous coronary interventions: A single-center experience [J].
Tomasello, Salvatore Davide ;
Boukhris, Marouane ;
Ganyukov, Vladimir ;
Galassi, Alfredo R. ;
Shukevich, Dmitri ;
Haes, Boris ;
Kochergin, Nikita ;
Tarasov, Roman ;
Popov, Vadim ;
Barbarash, Leonid .
HEART & LUNG, 2015, 44 (04) :309-313
[20]   Elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions supported by extracorporeal life support [J].
Vainer, Jindra ;
van Ommen, Vincent ;
Maessen, Jos ;
Geskes, Gijs ;
Lamerichs, Leon ;
Waltenberger, Johannes .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (06) :771-773