Outcomes of a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for elective, periprocedural support of high-risk percutaneous cardiac interventions: An experience from a latinamerican center

被引:3
作者
Bulnes, Juan F. [1 ]
Martinez, Alejandro [1 ]
Sepulveda, Pablo [1 ]
Fuensalida, Alberto [1 ]
Besa, Santiago [2 ]
Garrido, Luis [2 ]
Martinez, Gonzalo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catol, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Santiago, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catol, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Santiago, Chile
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Fac Med, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Head Intervent Cardiol, Diagonal Paraguay 362,7th floor, Santiago, Chile
来源
PERFUSION-UK | 2024年 / 39卷 / 05期
关键词
CHIP; high-risk interventions; protected PCI; protected TAVR; mechanical support; ECMO; VA-ECMO; CORONARY INTERVENTION; CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT; HEMODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1177/02676591231178413
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology include a wide spectrum of clinical and anatomical scenarios related to a higher periprocedural morbidity and mortality. The prophylactic use of short-term mechanical circulatory support (ST-MCS) may improve both the safety and efficacy of the intervention by leading to more stable procedural hemodynamics. However, the significant costs may limit its use in resource constrained settings. To overcome this limitation, we ideated a modified, low-cost, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (V-A ECMO) setup. Methods We conducted an observational prospective study including all patients undergoing a high-risk interventional cardiology procedure at our institution under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost version of V-A ECMO, where some components of the standard V-A ECMO circuit were replaced by supplies used for cardiac surgical cardiopulmonary bypass, achieving a cost reduction of 72%. We assessed in-hospital and mid-term outcomes, including procedural success, post-procedure complications and mortality. Results Between March 2016 and December 2021, ten patients underwent high-risk IC procedures with prophylactic use of V-A ECMO. Isolated percutaneous intervention (PCI) was performed in six patients, isolated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in two, and a combined procedure (PCI + TAVR) in two. Mean ejection fraction was 34% (range 20-64%). Mean STS PROM was 16.2% (range 9.5-35.8%) and mean EuroScore was 23.7% (range 1.5-60%). The planned intervention was successfully performed in all cases. There were no reports of V-A ECMO malfunction. In nine patients the VA-ECMO was withdrawn immediately after the procedure but one patient required extended - 24 h - support with no significant issues. One patient experienced a periprocedural myocardial infarction and another developed a femoral pseudoaneurysm. In-hospital and 30-day survival were 100%, and 1-year survival was 80%. Conclusions High-risk procedures in interventional cardiology can be successfully performed under prophylactic ST-MCS using a modified, low-cost V-A ECMO, suitable for limited-resource settings.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1005
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] In-Hospital and Mid-Term Outcomes of ECMO Support During Coronary, Structural, or Combined Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention in High-Risk Patients - A Single-Center Experience
    Brscic, Elvis
    Rovero, Gabriella
    Testa, Katiuscia
    Sori, Pierpaolo
    Iannaccone, Mario
    Decio, Alessandro
    Russo, Paolo
    Costa, Paolo
    Comoglio, Chiara
    Marra, Sebastiano
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 32 : 63 - 67
  • [2] Percutaneous Cardiopulmonary Support-Supported Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience
    Cho, Sung Soo
    Oh, Chang-Myung
    Jang, Ji-Yong
    Yu, Hee Tae
    Bang, Woo-Dae
    Kim, Jung-Sun
    Ko, Young-Guk
    Choi, Donghoon
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    Shim, Won-Heum
    Cho, Seung-Yun
    Jang, Yangsoo
    [J]. KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2011, 41 (06) : 299 - 303
  • [3] Optimizing Rotational Atherectomy in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Insights from the PROTECT II Study
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Ghatak, Abhijit
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    Naidu, Srihari S.
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Kirtane, Ajay J.
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Dzavik, Vladimir
    Palacios, Igor F.
    Heldman, Alan W.
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 83 (07) : 1057 - 1064
  • [4] Généreux P, 2021, EUR HEART J, V42, P1825, DOI [10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799, 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038]
  • [5] 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions
    Levine, Glenn N.
    Bates, Eric R.
    Blankenship, James C.
    Bailey, Steven R.
    Bittl, John A.
    Cercek, Bojan
    Chambers, Charles E.
    Ellis, Stephen G.
    Guyton, Robert A.
    Hollenberg, Steven M.
    Khot, Umesh N.
    Lange, Richard A.
    Mauri, Laura
    Mehran, Roxana
    Moussa, Issam D.
    Mukherjee, Debabrata
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    Ting, Henry H.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (23) : E574 - E651
  • [6] Loskutov Oleh A, 2020, J Extra Corpor Technol, V52, P196, DOI 10.1182/ject-1900039
  • [7] When the Complex Meets the High-Risk: Mechanical Cardiac Support Devices and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Severe Coronary Artery Disease
    Ly, Hung Q.
    Noly, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Nosair, Mohamed
    Lamarche, Yoan
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 36 (02) : 270 - 279
  • [8] Ventricular Support With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Beyond Cardiogenic Shock Treatment
    Merchan, Soraya
    Martin-Moreiras, Javier
    Uribarri, Aitor
    Lopez, Javier
    Reta, Leyre
    Sanchez, Pedro L.
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2015, 68 (10): : 897 - 899
  • [9] Percutaneous Circulatory Assist Devices for High-Risk Coronary Intervention
    Myat, Aung
    Patel, Niket
    Tehrani, Shana
    Banning, Adrian P.
    Redwood, Simon R.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (02) : 229 - 244
  • [10] A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The PROTECT II Study
    O'Neill, William W.
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Dixon, Simon
    Massaro, Joseph
    Palacios, Igor
    Maini, Brijeshwar
    Mulukutla, Suresh
    Dzavik, Vladimir
    Popma, Jeffrey
    Douglas, Pamela S.
    Ohman, Magnus
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (14) : 1717 - +