Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women

被引:4
|
作者
Rawashdeh, Hasan [1 ]
Aljalodi, Haneen [1 ]
Shamleh, Rafeef Abu [1 ]
Alshorman, Sumyah [2 ]
AboShindi, Heba [3 ]
Awawdeh, Shatha [4 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Amman, Jordan
[2] King Abdulla Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Ar Ramtha, Jordan
[3] Univ Res Co, USAID Hlth Serv Qual Accelerator Act, Amman, Jordan
[4] Univ Jordan, King Abdullah II School Informat Technol, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section (VBAC); Cesarean section repeat; Validation; Jordan; PREDICTION MODEL; DELIVERY; NOMOGRAM; RATES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-023-05385-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo validate both models of Grobman nomogram (The antenatal and the intrapartum model) for predicting successful intended Vaginal Birth After Caesarean delivery (VBAC) in a Jordanian population.MethodsA retrospective study has identified all live, singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies with a previous lower segment cesarean section who opted for a Trial Of Labour After Caesarean Section (TOLAC) between January 2014 to December 2020. Five variables were used for the antenatal model, while ten variables were used for the intrapartum model. Two sets of patients were created: one for the antenatal model and the other for the intrapartum model. The predicted probability for each woman was calculated and compared with the successful VBAC for each category. The predictive ability was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic, and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined.ResultsThere were seven hundred and fourteen complete cases for the antenatal model and six hundred ninety-seven for the intrapartum model. Our population's overall number of VBAC is 83.89% for the antenatal group and 82.92% for the intrapartum group. The mean predicted probability for a successful intended VBAC using the antenatal and intrapartum models were 79.53 +/- 13.47 and 78.64 +/- 14.03, respectively. The antenatal and intrapartum predictive models ROC had an AUC of 65% (95% CI: 60%-71%) and 64% (95% CI: 58%-69%), respectively.ConclusionsBoth models are validated in the Jordanian population. Adapting the antenatal model as supporting evidence can lead to a higher rate of TOLAC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: Validation of a prediction model
    Mooney, Samantha S.
    Hiscock, Richard
    Clarke, Inkeri D'Arcy
    Craig, Simon
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [42] Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at the university hospital in Barcelona
    Baranov, Anton
    Gratacos, Eduard
    Vikhareva, Olga
    Figueras, Francesc
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (24) : 2998 - 3003
  • [43] Cesarean and Vaginal Birth in Canadian Women: A Comparison of Experiences
    Chalmers, Beverley
    Kaczorowski, Janusz
    Darling, Elizabeth
    Heaman, Maureen
    Fell, Deshayne B.
    O'Brien, Beverley
    Lee, Lily
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2010, 37 (01): : 44 - 49
  • [44] Vaginal birth after Cesarean section and levator ani avulsion: a case-control study
    Paymova, L.
    Svabik, K.
    Neumann, A.
    Kalis, V
    Ismail, K. M.
    Rusavy, Z.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (02) : 303 - 308
  • [45] A prospective study of a new prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean section at a tertiary care centre
    Lakra, Pinkey
    Patil, Bhagyashri
    Siwach, Sunita
    Upadhyay, Manisha
    Shivani, Shivani
    Sangwan, Vijayata
    Mahendru, Rajiv
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 17 (04) : 278 - 284
  • [46] Persistent post-partum pain after vaginal birth and cesarean section
    Fabris, Lada Kalagac
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2011, 113 (02) : 239 - 241
  • [47] Pregestational Diabetes: A Risk Factor for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section Failure?
    Dharan, Vanita B.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Parry, Samuel
    Ratcliffe, Sarah J.
    Macones, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2010, 27 (03) : 265 - 270
  • [48] Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: Risk of Uterine Rupture with Labor Induction
    Ouzounian, Joseph G.
    Miller, David A.
    Hiebert, Christy J.
    Battista, Leah R.
    Lee, Richard H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2011, 28 (08) : 593 - 596
  • [49] Labour characteristics of women achieving successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in three European countries
    Grylka-Baeschlin, Susanne
    Clarke, Mike
    Begley, Cecily
    Daly, Deirdre
    Healy, Patricia
    Nicoletti, Jane
    Devane, Declan
    Morano, Sandra
    Krause, Gerard
    Karch, Andre
    Savage, Gerard
    Gross, Mechthild M.
    MIDWIFERY, 2019, 74 : 36 - 43
  • [50] Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery
    Grobman, William
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (05) : E217 - E233