Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women

被引:4
|
作者
Rawashdeh, Hasan [1 ]
Aljalodi, Haneen [1 ]
Shamleh, Rafeef Abu [1 ]
Alshorman, Sumyah [2 ]
AboShindi, Heba [3 ]
Awawdeh, Shatha [4 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Amman, Jordan
[2] King Abdulla Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Ar Ramtha, Jordan
[3] Univ Res Co, USAID Hlth Serv Qual Accelerator Act, Amman, Jordan
[4] Univ Jordan, King Abdullah II School Informat Technol, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section (VBAC); Cesarean section repeat; Validation; Jordan; PREDICTION MODEL; DELIVERY; NOMOGRAM; RATES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-023-05385-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo validate both models of Grobman nomogram (The antenatal and the intrapartum model) for predicting successful intended Vaginal Birth After Caesarean delivery (VBAC) in a Jordanian population.MethodsA retrospective study has identified all live, singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies with a previous lower segment cesarean section who opted for a Trial Of Labour After Caesarean Section (TOLAC) between January 2014 to December 2020. Five variables were used for the antenatal model, while ten variables were used for the intrapartum model. Two sets of patients were created: one for the antenatal model and the other for the intrapartum model. The predicted probability for each woman was calculated and compared with the successful VBAC for each category. The predictive ability was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic, and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined.ResultsThere were seven hundred and fourteen complete cases for the antenatal model and six hundred ninety-seven for the intrapartum model. Our population's overall number of VBAC is 83.89% for the antenatal group and 82.92% for the intrapartum group. The mean predicted probability for a successful intended VBAC using the antenatal and intrapartum models were 79.53 +/- 13.47 and 78.64 +/- 14.03, respectively. The antenatal and intrapartum predictive models ROC had an AUC of 65% (95% CI: 60%-71%) and 64% (95% CI: 58%-69%), respectively.ConclusionsBoth models are validated in the Jordanian population. Adapting the antenatal model as supporting evidence can lead to a higher rate of TOLAC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Limitations of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Success Prediction
    Thornton, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 63 (01) : 115 - 120
  • [32] Epidural analgesia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC): a significant adjunct to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC)
    Grisaru-Granovsky, Sorina
    Bas-Lando, Maayan
    Drukker, Lior
    Haouzi, Fred
    Farkash, Rivka
    Samueloff, Arnon
    Ioscovich, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (03) : 261 - 269
  • [33] Vaginal birth after cesarean section-The world trend and local experience in Taiwan
    Tsai, Hsiu-Ting
    Wu, Chia-Hsun
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 56 (01): : 41 - 45
  • [34] Analysis of influencing factors and establishment of prediction model for successful vaginal delivery after cesarean section
    Zhang, Hongxia
    Yu, Lin
    Wei, Songquan
    Li, Guiming
    FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 6
  • [35] Women's views of birth after cesarean section
    Sys, Dorota
    Kajdy, Anna
    Baranowska, Barbara
    Tataj-Puzyna, Urszula
    Gotlib, Joanna
    Baczek, Grazyna
    Rabijewski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (12) : 4270 - 4279
  • [36] Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Experience from a regional hospital
    Chen, Yi Ting
    Hsieh, Yun-Chiao
    Shen, Hung
    Cheng, Chin-Ho
    Lee, Kuang-Han
    Torng, Pao-Ling
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (03): : 422 - 426
  • [37] Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women
    Xu, Ping
    Feng, Ying
    Shen, Huaxiang
    Luo, Jing
    Tao, Yueping
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (52)
  • [38] Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
    Bhide, Amarnath
    Caric, Vedrana
    Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 133 (03) : 297 - 300
  • [39] Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean in China
    Rao, Jiaming
    Fan, Dazhi
    Li, Pengsheng
    Li, Yiying
    Hu, Pengzhen
    Wu, Zhaoxia
    He, Jieyun
    Liu, Xinjuan
    Peng, BingJie
    Guo, Xiaoling
    Liu, Zhengping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 163 (01) : 202 - 210
  • [40] Risk score for failed trial of vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section including data of labor course
    Machado Junior, Luis C.
    Fama, Eduardo A. B.
    Zamboni, Jorge W.
    Awada, Pedro F.
    Araujo, Talitha A.
    Nascimento-Ferreira, Marcus V.
    de Carvalho, Heraclito B.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (01) : 93 - 103