Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women

被引:4
|
作者
Rawashdeh, Hasan [1 ]
Aljalodi, Haneen [1 ]
Shamleh, Rafeef Abu [1 ]
Alshorman, Sumyah [2 ]
AboShindi, Heba [3 ]
Awawdeh, Shatha [4 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Amman, Jordan
[2] King Abdulla Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Ar Ramtha, Jordan
[3] Univ Res Co, USAID Hlth Serv Qual Accelerator Act, Amman, Jordan
[4] Univ Jordan, King Abdullah II School Informat Technol, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section (VBAC); Cesarean section repeat; Validation; Jordan; PREDICTION MODEL; DELIVERY; NOMOGRAM; RATES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-023-05385-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo validate both models of Grobman nomogram (The antenatal and the intrapartum model) for predicting successful intended Vaginal Birth After Caesarean delivery (VBAC) in a Jordanian population.MethodsA retrospective study has identified all live, singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies with a previous lower segment cesarean section who opted for a Trial Of Labour After Caesarean Section (TOLAC) between January 2014 to December 2020. Five variables were used for the antenatal model, while ten variables were used for the intrapartum model. Two sets of patients were created: one for the antenatal model and the other for the intrapartum model. The predicted probability for each woman was calculated and compared with the successful VBAC for each category. The predictive ability was assessed with a receiver operating characteristic, and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined.ResultsThere were seven hundred and fourteen complete cases for the antenatal model and six hundred ninety-seven for the intrapartum model. Our population's overall number of VBAC is 83.89% for the antenatal group and 82.92% for the intrapartum group. The mean predicted probability for a successful intended VBAC using the antenatal and intrapartum models were 79.53 +/- 13.47 and 78.64 +/- 14.03, respectively. The antenatal and intrapartum predictive models ROC had an AUC of 65% (95% CI: 60%-71%) and 64% (95% CI: 58%-69%), respectively.ConclusionsBoth models are validated in the Jordanian population. Adapting the antenatal model as supporting evidence can lead to a higher rate of TOLAC.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vaginal birth after cesarean section and levator ani avulsion
    Paymova, L.
    Kalis, V
    Sperlova, T.
    Nova, V
    Rusavy, Z.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 85 (05): : 296 - 301
  • [22] Risk management of vaginal birth after cesarean section (Review)
    Carauleanu, Alexandru
    Tanasa, Ingrid Andrada
    Nemescu, Dragos
    Socolov, Demetra
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (04)
  • [23] Morbidity associated with failed vaginal birth after cesarean section
    Oboro, Victor
    Adewunmi, Adeniyi
    Ande, Anibaba
    Olagbuji, Biodun
    Ezeanochie, Michael
    Oyeniran, Ayodeji
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (09) : 1229 - 1232
  • [24] Examining the validity of a predictive model for vaginal birth after cesarean
    Wong, Jennifer W. H.
    Yoshino, Kurt D. N.
    Ahn, Hyeong Jun
    Choi, So Yung
    Chang, Ann L.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 48 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [26] Predictors of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mekonnen, Birye Dessalegn
    Asfaw, Aragaw Awoke
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [27] Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yanxin Wu
    Yachana Kataria
    Zilian Wang
    Wai-Kit Ming
    Christina Ellervik
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [28] Prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A systematic review
    Deng, Bo
    Li, Yan
    Chen, Jia-Yin
    Guo, Jun
    Tan, Jing
    Yang, Yang
    Liu, Ning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 135
  • [29] Do They Stand a Chance? Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section in Adolescents Compared to Adult Women
    Damle, Lauren F.
    Wilson, Kathy
    Huang, Chun-Chih
    Landy, Helain J.
    Gomez-Lobo, Veronica
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 28 (04) : 219 - 223
  • [30] Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
    Harris, Benjamin S.
    Heine, R. Phillips
    Park, Jinyoung
    Faurot, Keturah R.
    Hopkins, Maeve K.
    Rivera, Andrew J.
    Kemeny, Hanna R.
    Grotegut, Chad A.
    Jelovsek, J. Eric
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) : 492.e1 - 492.e7