Automated quantification of PET/CT skeletal tumor burden in prostate cancer using artificial intelligence: The PET index

被引:8
作者
Belal, Sarah Lindgren [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larsson, Mans [4 ]
Holm, Jorun [5 ]
Buch-Olsen, Karen Middelbo [5 ]
Soerensen, Jens [6 ]
Bjartell, Anders [7 ]
Edenbrandt, Lars [8 ]
Tragardh, Elin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Div Nucl Med, Malmo, Sweden
[2] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Wallenberg Ctr Mol Med, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Eigenvis AB, Malmo, Sweden
[5] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Odense, Denmark
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Div Radiol, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Div Urol Canc, Malmo, Sweden
[8] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Med, Dept Mol & Clin Med, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
PET-CT; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Tumor burden; Prostate cancer; WHOLE-BODY; F-18-NAF PET/CT; METASTASES;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-023-06108-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Consistent assessment of bone metastases is crucial for patient management and clinical trials in prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to develop a fully automated convolutional neural network (CNN)-based model for calculating PET/CT skeletal tumor burden in patients with PCa. Methods A total of 168 patients from three centers were divided into training, validation, and test groups. Manual annotations of skeletal lesions in -[F-18]fluoride PET/CT scans were used to train a CNN. The AI model was evaluated in 26 patients and compared to segmentations by physicians and to a SUV 15 threshold. PET index representing the percentage of skeletal volume taken up by lesions was estimated. Results There was no case in which all readers agreed on prevalence of lesions that the AI model failed to detect. PET index by the AI model correlated moderately strong to physician PET index (mean r = 0.69). Threshold PET index correlated fairly with physician PET index (mean r = 0.49). The sensitivity for lesion detection was 65-76% for AI, 68-91% for physicians, and 44-51% for threshold depending on which physician was considered reference. Conclusion It was possible to develop an AI-based model for automated assessment of PET/CT skeletal tumor burden. The model's performance was superior to using a threshold and provides fully automated calculation of whole-body skeletal tumor burden. It could be further developed to apply to different radiotracers. Objective scan evaluation is a first step toward developing a PET/CT imaging biomarker for PCa skeletal metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:1510 / 1520
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Phase 3 Assessment of the Automated Bone Scan Index as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker of Overall Survival in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Armstrong, Andrew J.
    Anand, Aseem
    Edenbrandt, Lars
    Bondesson, Eva
    Bjartell, Anders
    Widmark, Anders
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    Pili, Roberto
    Tuvesson, Helen
    Nordle, Orjan
    Carducci, Michael A.
    Morris, Michael J.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (07) : 944 - 951
  • [2] Deep learning for segmentation of 49 selected bones in CT scans: First step in automated PET/CT-based 3D quantification of skeletal metastases
    Belal, Sarah Lindgren
    Sadik, May
    Kaboteh, Reza
    Enqvist, Olof
    Ulen, Johannes
    Poulsen, Mads H.
    Simonsen, Jane
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul F.
    Edenbrandt, Lars
    Tragardh, Elin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 113 : 89 - 95
  • [3] 3D skeletal uptake of 18F sodium fluoride in PET/CT images is associated with overall survival in patients with prostate cancer
    Belal, Sarah Lindgren
    Sadik, May
    Kaboteh, Reza
    Hasani, Nezar
    Enqvist, Olof
    Svarm, Linus
    Kahl, Fredrik
    Simonsen, Jane
    Poulsen, Mads H.
    Ohlsson, Mattias
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul F.
    Edenbrandt, Lars
    Tragardh, Elin
    [J]. EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2017, 7
  • [4] Exploring New Multimodal Quantitative Imaging Indices for the Assessment of Osseous Tumor Burden in Prostate Cancer Using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT
    Bieth, Marie
    Kroenke, Markus
    Tauber, Robert
    Dahlbender, Marielena
    Retz, Margitta
    Nekolla, Stephan G.
    Menze, Bjoern
    Maurer, Tobias
    Eiber, Matthias
    Schwaiger, Markus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (10) : 1632 - 1637
  • [5] Evaluation of whole-body tumor burden with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
    Brito, A. E. T.
    Mourato, F. A.
    de Oliveira, R. P. M.
    Leal, A. L. G.
    Filho, P. J. A.
    de Filho, J. L. L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (05) : 344 - 350
  • [6] Whole-body uptake classification and prostate cancer staging in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using dual-tracer learning
    Capobianco, Nicolo
    Sibille, Ludovic
    Chantadisai, Maythinee
    Gafita, Andrei
    Langbein, Thomas
    Platsch, Guenther
    Solari, Esteban Lucas
    Shah, Vijay
    Spottiswoode, Bruce
    Eiber, Matthias
    Weber, Wolfgang A.
    Navab, Nassir
    Nekolla, Stephan G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (02) : 517 - 526
  • [7] E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET
    Ceci, Francesco
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Emmett, Louise
    Adam, Judit A.
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    Czernin, Johannes
    Eiber, Matthias
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Schwarzenboeck, Sarah M.
    Fanti, Stefano
    Herrmann, Ken
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (05) : 1626 - 1638
  • [8] Chan Y H, 2003, Singapore Med J, V44, P614
  • [9] Cicek Ozgun, 2016, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2016. 19th International Conference. Proceedings: LNCS 9901, P424, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49
  • [10] Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT
    Eiber, Matthias
    Herrmann, Ken
    Calais, Jeremie
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Giesel, Frederik L.
    Hartenbach, Markus
    Hope, Thomas
    Reiter, Robert
    Maurer, Tobias
    Weber, Wolfgang A.
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (03) : 469 - 478