Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients' perspectives

被引:4
作者
Small, Serena S. [1 ,2 ]
Lau, Erica [1 ,2 ]
McFarlane, Kassandra [3 ]
Archambault, Patrick M. [4 ,5 ]
Longstaff, Holly [6 ,7 ]
Hohl, Corinne M. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Emergency Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Evaluat, 828 West 10th Ave,7th Fl, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Sch Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Ctr Integre Sante & Serv Sociaux Chaudiere Appalac, Ctr Rech, Levis, PQ, Canada
[6] Prov Hlth Serv Author, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[8] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Emergency Dept, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Patient participation; COVID-19; Privacy; Methods;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundVirtual data collection methods and consent procedures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic enabled continued research activities, but also introduced concerns about equity, inclusivity, representation, and privacy. Recent studies have explored these issues from institutional and researcher perspectives, but there is a need to explore patient perspectives and preferences. This study aims to explore COVID-19 patients' perspectives about research recruitment and consent for research studies about COVID-19.MethodsWe conducted an exploratory qualitative focus group and interview study among British Columbian adults who self-identified as having had COVID-19. We recruited participants through personal contacts, social media, and REACH BC, an online platform that connects researchers and patients in British Columbia. We analyzed transcripts inductively and developed thematic summaries of each coding element.ResultsOf the 22 individuals recruited, 16 attended a focus group or interview. We found that autonomy and the feasibility of participation, attitudes toward research about COVID-19, and privacy concerns are key factors that influence participants' willingness to participate in research. We also found that participants preferred remote and virtual approaches for contact, consent, and delivery of research on COVID-19.ConclusionsIndividuals who had COVID-19 are motivated to participate in research studies and value autonomy in their decision to participate, but researchers must be sensitive and considerate toward patient preferences and concerns, particularly as researchers adopt virtual recruitment and data collection methods. Such awareness may increase research participation and engagement. Plain English SummaryDue to the COVID-19 pandemic, many research groups started conducting research activities virtually. In this study, we invited individuals who had COVID-19 to share their views about how researchers recruit patients and get their consent to participate in studies about COVID-19. Through interviews and focus groups, we found that British Columbians who had COVID-19 are motivated to participate in COVID-related studies, as long as researchers maintain usual precautions around data privacy and accommodate preferences for participation. Future studies may use these patient perspectives to make informed decisions that will increase and support patient recruitment, consent and retention in research studies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] BC Centre for Disease Control, 2022, COVID 19 PAT DAT RES
  • [2] Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using Electronic Health Records
    Callard, Felicity
    Broadbent, Matthew
    Denis, Mike
    Hotopf, Matthew
    Soncul, Murat
    Wykes, Til
    Lovestone, Simon
    Stewart, Robert
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (12):
  • [3] Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2020, HLTH DAT INF GOV CAP
  • [4] Conducting Qualitative Research Online: Challenges and Solutions
    Carter, Stacy M.
    Shih, Patti
    Williams, Jane
    Degeling, Chris
    Mooney-Somers, Julie
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (06) : 711 - 718
  • [5] Distrust, race, and research
    Corbie-Smith, G
    Thomas, SB
    St George, DMM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (21) : 2458 - 2463
  • [6] Consent in covid: A researcher's dilemma
    Garg, Heena
    Khanna, Puneet
    [J]. TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 38 : 10 - 12
  • [7] Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in research - call for action
    Gill, Paramjit S.
    Redwood, Sabi
    Gill, Paramjit S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (612) : 342 - 343
  • [8] Treatments, resource utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments across pandemic waves: an observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN)
    Hohl, Corinne M.
    Rosychuk, Rhonda J.
    Hau, Jeffrey P.
    Hayward, Jake
    Landes, Megan
    Yan, Justin W.
    Ting, Daniel K.
    Welsford, Michelle
    Archambault, Patrick M.
    Mercier, Eric
    Chandra, Kavish
    Davis, Philip
    Vaillancourt, Samuel
    Leeies, Murdoch
    Small, Serena
    Morrison, Laurie J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (04) : 397 - 407
  • [9] APPEALING TO ALTRUISM IS NOT ENOUGH: MOTIVATORS FOR PARTICIPATING IN HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
    Hunter, Jennifer
    Corcoran, Katherine
    Leeder, Stephen
    Phelps, Kerryn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2012, 7 (03) : 84 - 90
  • [10] Altruism: A form of hope for patients with advanced cancer
    Kardinal, C. G.
    Sanders, J. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)