Safer cycling in older age (SiFAr): effects of a multi-component cycle training. a randomized controlled trial

被引:3
作者
Keppner, Veronika [1 ]
Krumpoch, Sebastian [1 ]
Kob, Robert [1 ]
Rappl, Anja [2 ]
Sieber, Cornel. C. C. [1 ,3 ]
Freiberger, Ellen [1 ]
Siebentritt, Hanna Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Biomed Aging, Kobergerstr 60, D-90408 Nurnberg, Bavaria, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
[3] Kantonsspital Winterthur, Dept Med, Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Aging; e-bike; Cycling safety; Cycle training; Mobility; Randomized controlled trial; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-023-03816-2
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background The risk of older adults being injured or killed in a bicycle accident increases significantly due to the age-related decline of physical function. Therefore, targeted interventions for older adults to improve safe cycling competence (CC) are urgently needed. Methods The "Safer Cycling in Older Age" (SiFAr) randomized controlled trial investigated if a progressive multi component training program related to cycling improves CC of older adults. Between June 2020 and May 2022, 127 community-dwelling persons living in the area Nurnberg-Furth-Erlangen, Germany aged 65 years and older were recruited, who are either (1) beginners with the e-bike or (2) feeling self-reported unsteadiness when cycling or (3) uptaking cycling after a longer break. Participants were either randomized 1:1 to an intervention group (IG; cycling exercise program, 8 sessions within 3 months) or an active control group (aCG; health recommendations). The CC as primary outcome was tested not blinded in a standardized cycle course prior and after the intervention period and after 6-9 months, which consists of variant tasks requiring skills related to daily traffic situations. Regression analyses with difference of errors in the cycling course as dependent variable and group as independent variable adjusted for covariates (gender, number of errors at baseline, bicycle type, age and cycled distance) were performed. Results 96 participants (73.4 +/- 5.1 years; 59.4% female) were analyzed for primary outcome. Compared to the aCG (n = 49), the IG (n = 47) made an average of 2.37 fewer errors in the cycle course after the 3 months intervention period (p = 0.004). People with more errors at baseline had higher potential for improvement (B=-0.38; p < 0.001). Women on average made 2.31 (p = 0.016) more errors than men, even after intervention. All other confounders had no significant effect on the difference in errors. The intervention effect was very stable until 6-9 months after the intervention (B=3.07, p = 0.003), but decreased with a higher age at baseline in the adjusted model (B = 0.21, p = 0.0499). Conclusion The SiFAr program increases cycling skills among older adults with self-perceived needs for improvement in CC and could easily be made available to a broad public due to its standardized structure and a train the-trainer approach.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] High-Speed Cycling Intervention Improves Rate-Dependent Mobility in Older Adults
    Bellumori, Maria
    Uygur, Mehmet
    Knight, Christopher A.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [2] Crashes involving cyclists aged 50 and over in in-depth study the Netherlands: An in-depth study
    BoeleVos, M. J.
    Van Duijvenvoorde, K.
    Doumen, M. J. A.
    Duivenvoorden, C. W. A. E.
    Louwerse, W. J. R.
    Davidse, R. J.
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 105 : 4 - 10
  • [3] Health benefits of cycle ergometer training for older adults over 70: a review
    Bouaziz, Walid
    Schmitt, Elise
    Kaltenbach, Georges
    Geny, Bernard
    Vogel, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2015, 12
  • [4] Bundesanstalt fur Strassenwesen, 2021, MENSCH SICHERHEIT
  • [5] Confederation of the European Bicycle Industry (CONEBI) Edited by Industry CotEB, 2022, BIC E BIK SAL CONT G
  • [6] Does a cycle training course improve cycling skills in children?
    Ducheyne, Fabian
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    Lenoir, Matthieu
    Cardon, Greet
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 59 : 38 - 45
  • [7] EU: (European Commission), 2022, European Road Safety Observatory
  • [8] Why don't more women cycle? An analysis of female and male commuter cycling mode-share in England and Wales
    Grudgings, Nick
    Hagen-Zanker, Alex
    Hughes, Susan
    Gatersleben, Birgitta
    Woodall, Marc
    Bryans, Will
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2018, 10 : 272 - 283
  • [9] Hagemeister C, 2013, P INT CYCLING SAFETY
  • [10] E-bike safety: Individual-level factors and incident characteristics
    Haustein, Sonja
    Moller, Mette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2016, 3 (03) : 386 - 394