The low dimensionality of post-stroke cognitive deficits: it's the lesion anatomy!

For years, dissociation studies on neurological single-case patients with brain lesions were the dominant method to infer fundamental cognitive functions in neuropsychology. In contrast, the association between deficits was considered to be of less epistemological value. Still, associational computational methods for dimensionality reduction-such as principal component analysis or factor analysis-became popular for the identification of fundamental cognitive functions and to understand human cognitive brain architecture from post-stroke neuropsychological profiles. In the present in silico study with lesion imaging of 300 stroke patients, we investigated the dimensionality of artificial simulated neuropsychological profiles that exclusively contained independent fundamental cognitive functions without any underlying low-dimensional cognitive architecture. Still, the anatomy of stroke lesions alone was sufficient to create a dependence between variables that allowed a low-dimensional description of the data with principal component analysis. All criteria that we used to estimate the dimensionality of data, including the Kaiser criterion, were strongly affected by lesion anatomy, while the Joliffe criterion provided the least affected estimates. The dimensionality of profiles was reduced by 62-70% for the Kaiser criterion, up to the degree that is commonly found in neuropsychological studies on actual cognitive measures. The interpretability of such low-dimensional factors as deficits of fundamental cognitive functions and their provided insights into human cognitive architecture thus seem to be severely limited, and the heavy focus of current cognitive neuroscience on group studies and associations calls for improvements. We suggest that qualitative criteria and dissociation patterns could be used to refine estimates for the dimensionality of the cognitive architecture behind post-stroke deficits. Further, given the strong impact of lesion anatomy on the associational structure of data, we see the need for further optimization of interpretation strategies of computational factors in post-stroke lesion studies of cognitive deficits. Today cognitive neuroscience favours the investigation of associations-and not dissociations-in group studies. However, Sperber et al. show that a low-dimensional structure of associations in neuropsychological data in stroke does not imply a low-dimensional cognitive architecture behind post-stroke deficits, as it also reflects lesion anatomy.