Understanding Shield Laws

被引：5

作者：

Cohen, David S. ^{[1
]}

Donley, Greer ^{[2
]}

Rebouche, Rachel ^{[3
]}

Aubrun, Isabelle ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Drexel Univ, Thomas R Kline Sch Law, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA

[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Law Sch, Pittsburgh, PA USA

[3] Temple Univ, Beasley Sch Law, Philadelphia, PA USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS | 2023年 / 51卷 / 03期

关键词：

Shield Laws; Reproductive Rights; Dobbs; Roe; Abortion;

D O I：

10.1017/jme.2023.103

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

In anticipation of extraterritorial application of antiabortion laws, many states have enacted laws that attempt to shield abortion providers, helpers, and patients from civil, professional, or criminal liability associated with legal abortion care. This essay analyzes and compares the statutory schemes of the seven early adopting shield states: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York. After describing what the laws do and how they operate, we offer reflections on coming disputes, areas of legal uncertainty, and ways to improve future shield laws.

引用

页码：584 / 591

页数：8

共 13 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1936, Unif. Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses From Without a State in Crim.Proc. 3

[2]

[Anonymous], 2022, Testimony in Support of HB 5414 Before Connecticut General Assembly Joint Committee on Judiciary, 2022 Reg. Sess

[3]

[Anonymous], 2007, Unif. Interstate Depositions and Discovery Act 3

[4]

[Anonymous], 2022, N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law 570.17

[5]

[Anonymous], 1998, Baker v. General Motors Corp.

[6]

Baden K., 2023, The state of abortion policy landscape one year post-Roe

[7]

Caraballo A., 2023, City University of New York Law Review, V26, P1

[8]

Cohen D. S., 2024, Stanford Law Review, V76, P1

[9]

Cohen DS, 2023, COLUMBIA LAW REV, V123, P36

[10]

Cohen DS., 2015, Living in the Crosshairs: the Untold Stories of Anti -Abortion Terrorism

← 1 2 →