Integrating PCA and structural model decomposition to improve fault monitoring and diagnosis with varying operation points

被引:10
作者
Garcia-Alvarez, D. [1 ]
Bregon, A. [1 ]
Pulido, B. [1 ]
Alonso-Gonzalez, C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Dept Informat, Valladolid 47011, Spain
关键词
Fault diagnosis; Model decomposition; Possible Conflicts; Multivariate Statistical Process Control; Principal Component Analysis; Multiple Operation Points Systems; RESIDUAL SELECTION; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; CONFLICTS; PLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106145
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Fast and efficient fault monitoring and diagnostics methods are essential for fault diagnosis and prognosis tasks in Health Monitoring Systems. These tasks are even more complicated when facing dynamic systems with multiple operation points. This article introduces a symbiotic solution for fault detection and isolation, based on the integration of two complementary techniques: Possible Conflicts (PCs), a model-based diagnosis technique from the Artificial Intelligence (AI) community, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), a Multivariate Statistical Process Control (MSPC) technique. Our proposal improves the PCA-based fault detection in systems with multiple operation points and transient states and provides a straightforward fault isolation stage for PCA. At the same time, the proposal increases the robustness for fault detection using PCs through the application of PCA to the residual signals. PCA has the ability to filter out residual deviations caused by model uncertainties that can lead to a high number of false positives. The proposed method has been successfully tested in a real-world plant with accurate fault detection results. The plant has noisy sensors and a system model without the same accuracy at each operation point and transient states.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Alonso-Gonzalez CJ, 2011, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V7023, P223, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-25274-7_23
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, A tutorial on principal component analysis
[3]  
Armengol J., 2009, 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision, and Safety of Technical Processes, V42, P1480, DOI DOI 10.3182/20090630-4-ES-2003
[4]   A new adaptive PCA based thresholding scheme for fault detection in complex systems [J].
Bakdi, Azzeddine ;
Kouadri, Abdelmalek .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2017, 162 :83-93
[5]   Diagnosis of a battery energy storage system based on principal component analysis [J].
Banguero, Edison ;
Correcher, Antonio ;
Perez-Navarro, Angel ;
Garcia, Emilio ;
Aristizabal, Andres .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 146 :2438-2449
[6]  
Blanke M., 2006, IFAC P, V39, P629
[7]  
Blanke M., 2003, Diagnosis and fault-tolerant control, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-35653-0
[8]  
Bregon A, 2016, CONF CONTR FAULT-TOL, P499, DOI 10.1109/SYSTOL.2016.7739798
[9]   Integration of Simulation and State Observers for Online Fault Detection of Nonlinear Continuous Systems [J].
Bregon, Anibal ;
Alonso-Gonzalez, Carlos J. ;
Pulido, Belarmino .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2014, 44 (12) :1553-1568
[10]   A Decomposition Method for Nonlinear Parameter Estimation in TRANSCEND [J].
Bregon, Anibal ;
Biswas, Gautam ;
Pulido, Belarmino .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2012, 42 (03) :751-763