Effect of acclimatization rate on biogas production from anaerobic digestion of biodiesel waste products

被引:4
作者
Rackliffe, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Ni, Ji-Qin [1 ,3 ]
Mosier, Nathan S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Lab Renewable Resource Engn, W Lafayette, IN USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2023年 / 17卷 / 06期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
anaerobic co-digestion; biodiesel byproducts; crude glycerol; biodiesel wastewater; microbial adaptation; CO-DIGESTION; CRUDE GLYCEROL; WATER; INHIBITION; SLUDGE; MANURE; UASB;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.2521
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Digester acclimatization can improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestion (AD), a potentially sustainable process for generating biogas from the biological decomposition of organic byproducts from biodiesel production. This study examined the impact of acclimatization rate on biogas production and conversion efficiency in laboratory digesters using inocula from a wastewater treatment plant digester and from an agro-industrial waste digester. The results showed that co-digestion of crude glycerol and biodiesel wastewater at high organic loading rates, up to 6.8 g chemical oxygen demand (COD) L-1 day(-1), is possible without the addition of other substrates or pretreatment. Higher organic loading rates were achieved in the digesters using inocula from the agro-industrial waste digester than in the digesters using the wastewater treatment plant digester, indicating that an inoculum with similar physical characteristics may be most appropriate for the AD of biodiesel waste. Of the two acclimatization rates studied, the slower rate improved the cumulative biogas production for both inocula. Both inocula also exhibited higher maximum daily efficiencies with a slower rate of acclimatization, up to a maximum average daily biogas yield of 621 mL biogas g(-1) COD added. This implied that the rate of acclimatization can impact the ability of the digester to adapt efficiently to a new substrate.
引用
收藏
页码:1541 / 1553
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
APHA, 1992, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater
[2]   Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate [J].
Astals, S. ;
Nolla-Ardevol, V. ;
Mata-Alvarez, J. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 110 :63-70
[3]   Anaerobic digestion of crude glycerol from biodiesel manufacturing using a large-scale pilot plant: Methane production and application of digested sludge as fertilizer [J].
Baba, Yasunori ;
Tada, Chika ;
Watanabe, Ryoya ;
Fukuda, Yasuhiro ;
Chida, Nobuyoshi ;
Nakai, Yutaka .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 140 :342-348
[4]   Effect of pH, OLR, and HRT on performance of acidogenic and methanogenic reactors for treatment of biodiesel wastewater [J].
Boonsawang, Piyarat ;
Rerngnarong, Athirat ;
Tongurai, Chakrit ;
Chaiprapat, Sumate .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2015, 54 (12) :3317-3327
[5]   Use of trace elements addition for anaerobic digestion of brewer's spent grains [J].
Bougrier, Claire ;
Dognin, Delphine ;
Laroche, Cecile ;
Rivero, Jesus Andres Cacho .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 223 :101-107
[6]   Optimization of biogas production from cattle manure by pre-treatment with ultrasound and co-digestion with crude glycerin [J].
Castrillon, L. ;
Fernandez-Nava, Y. ;
Ormaechea, P. ;
Maranon, E. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (17) :7845-7849
[7]   Toxicants inhibiting anaerobic digestion: A review [J].
Chen, Jian Lin ;
Ortiz, Raphael ;
Steele, Terry W. J. ;
Stuckey, David C. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2014, 32 (08) :1523-1534
[8]   Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review [J].
Chen, Ye ;
Cheng, Jay J. ;
Creamer, Kurt S. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (10) :4044-4064
[9]   Production of biodiesel and its wastewater treatment technologies: A review [J].
Daud, Nurull Muna ;
Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah Sheikh ;
Abu Hasan, Hassimi ;
Yaakob, Zahira .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2015, 94 :487-508
[10]  
EIA, 2022, EN INF ADM, P184