Social emotional processes during the third wave of COVID-19: Results from a close replication study in a Turkish sample

被引:0
作者
Altaytas, Alparslan Furkan [1 ]
Armagan, Ilkyaz Caggul [1 ]
Gulpinar, Aybars [1 ]
Ozdemir, Sahcan [1 ]
Karakale, Ozge [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Psychol Program, Northern Cyprus Campus, Mersin, Turkiye
关键词
COVID-19; Face masks; Social cognition; Emotion recognition; EYES; PERCEPTION; GENDER;
D O I
10.1002/ijop.12921
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Until recently, for almost 3 years, we used face masks to protect against COVID-19. Face masks disrupted our perception of socially relevant information, and impacted our social judgements as a result of the new social norms around wearing masks imposed by the pandemic. To shed light on such pandemic-induced changes in social emotional processes, Calbi et al. analysed data from an Italian sample collected in Spring 2020. They assessed valence, social distance and physical distance ratings for neutral, happy and angry male and female faces covered with a scarf or a mask. A year later, we used the same stimuli to investigate the same measures in a Turkish sample. We found that females attributed more negative valence ratings than males to angry faces, and that angry and neutral faces of females were rated more negatively than those of males. Scarf stimuli were evaluated more negatively in terms of valence. Participants attributed greater distance to more negative faces (angry > neutral > happy) and to scarf than the mask stimuli. Also, females attributed greater social and physical distance than males. These results may be explained by gender-stereotypic socialisation processes, and changes in people's perception of health behaviours during the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 464
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] Veiled Emotions: The Effect of Covered Faces on Emotion Perception and Attitudes
    Fischer, Agneta H.
    Gillebaart, Marleen
    Rotteveel, Mark
    Becker, Daniela
    Vliek, Michael
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2012, 3 (03) : 266 - 273
  • [12] Gaunt R, 2013, REV INT PSYCHOL SOC, V26, P29
  • [13] Facial appearance, gender, and emotion expression
    Hess, U
    Adams, RB
    Kleck, RE
    [J]. EMOTION, 2004, 4 (04) : 378 - 388
  • [14] Emotion through Locomotion: Gender Impact
    Krueger, Samuel
    Sokolov, Alexander N.
    Enck, Paul
    Kraegeloh-Mann, Ingeborg
    Pavlova, Marina A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11):
  • [15] During the COVID-19 pandemic participants prefer settings with a face mask, no interaction and at a closer distance
    Kuehne, K.
    Fischer, M. H.
    Jeglinski-Mende, M. A.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [16] Lundqvist D., 1998, The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section, DOI [10.1037/t27732-000, DOI 10.1037/T27732-000]
  • [17] Happy Facial Expressions Impair Inhibitory Control With Respect to Fearful Facial Expressions but Only When Task-Relevant
    Mancini, Christian
    Falciati, Luca
    Maioli, Claudio
    Mirabella, Giovanni
    [J]. EMOTION, 2022, 22 (01) : 142 - 152
  • [18] Threatening Facial Expressions Impact Goal-Directed Actions Only if Task-Relevant
    Mancini, Christian
    Falciati, Luca
    Maioli, Claudio
    Mirabella, Giovanni
    [J]. BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (11) : 1 - 18
  • [19] The effects of fear and anger facial expressions on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors
    Marsh, AA
    Ambady, N
    Kleck, RE
    [J]. EMOTION, 2005, 5 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [20] A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations
    Mathieu, Edouard
    Ritchie, Hannah
    Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban
    Roser, Max
    Hasell, Joe
    Appel, Cameron
    Giattino, Charlie
    Rodes-Guirao, Lucas
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2021, 5 (07) : 947 - 953