Two Cheers for Context

被引：0

作者：

Breckman, Warren ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Penn, Dept Hist, 208 Coll Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA

来源：

DEUTSCHE VIERTELJAHRSSCHRIFT FUR LITERATURWISSENSCHAFT UND GEISTESGESCHICHTE | 2023年 / 97卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/s41245-023-00162-4

中图分类号：

I0 [文学理论];

学科分类号：

0501 ; 050101 ;

摘要：

Though contextualism is a powerful orthodoxy in the Humanities, it is not without its critics. They complain that reliance on context creates the illusion of full meaning at a work's point of origin, unjustly contains the work within a historical box, and neutralizes the critical potential of past texts and ideas. Starting with the Spitzer-Lovejoy debate over Geistesgeschichte and History of Ideas in the 1940s and moving to a discussion of recent critics of contextualism, the essay concludes by rethinking the nature of contextual knowledge.

引用

页码：13 / 21

页数：9

共 17 条

[1]

Dominick LaCapra, 1983, TRACTATUS RETHINKING, P115

[2]

Felski R, 2011, NEW LITERARY HIST, V42, P573

[3]

Goldstein P, 2011, ELGAR LAW TECH SOC, pIX

[4]

Gordon PeterE., 2014, RETHINKING MODERN EU, P32

[5]

Hayot E, 2011, NEW LITERARY HIST, V42, P739

[6]

Lovejoy A.O., 1966, GREAT CHAIN BEING ST, P3

[7]

Lovejoy A.O., 1940, J HIST IDEAS, V1, P3

[8]

Lovejoy Arthur., 1924, PMLA, V39, P229, DOI DOI 10.2307/457184

[9]

Lovejoy ArthurO., 1944, J HIST IDEAS, V5, P204, DOI DOI 10.2307/2707385

[10]

Lovejoy ArthurO., 1941, J HIST IDEAS, V2, P257

← 1 2 →