Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a US cohort study

被引：5
作者：
Wang, Tongtong [1 ]
Sadowsky, Mordechai [2 ]
Blakney, Rebekah [1 ]
Coplan, Paul [1 ]
Petraiuolo, William [2 ]
Soberman, Mark [2 ]
Tomaszewski, Joerg [3 ]
Rene, Lexi [1 ]
Wood, Jennifer [1 ]
机构：
[1] Johnson & Johnson, Epidemiol & Real World Data Sci, MedTech, New Brunswick, NJ 08933 USA
[2] Johnson & Johnson, Med Safety, MedTech, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Johnson & Johnson, Med Affairs, MedTech, Raritan, NJ USA
来源：
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE | 2023年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词：
Anastomotic leak; Manual circular staplers; Left-sided colorectal surgery; Retrospective cohort study; Premier Healthcare Database (PHD); ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTAL-CANCER; SURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; DESIGN;
D O I：
10.1007/s00384-023-04552-0
中图分类号：
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号：
摘要：
PurposesTo compare the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) between Ethicon manual circular staplers (two-row) versus Medtronic EEA (TM) circular stapler with Tri-Staple (TM) technology (three-row) and between Medtronic EEA (TM) circular stapler with DST (TM) Series technology (two-row) versus Tri-Staple (TM) technology.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients who underwent a left-sided colorectal surgery 2019-2022 in U.S. Premier Healthcare Database to assess the risk of AL within 30 days post-index procedure. The study devices were Ethicon manual circular staplers, Medtronic EEA (TM) circular stapler with DST (TM) technology, and Medtronic EEA (TM) circular stapler with Tri-Staple (TM) technology.ResultsAcross 447 hospitals, the cumulative incidences (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of AL within 30 days post-index procedure were 7.78% (6.91-8.74%) among 8337 patients in the Ethicon manual circular stapler cohort, 7.54% (6.87-8.27%) among 7928 patients in the Medtronic EEA (TM) circular stapler with DST (TM) technology cohort, and 8.19% (6.57-10.07%) among 1306 patients in the Medtronic EEA (TM) circular stapler with Tri-Staple (TM) technology cohort. Comparative analyses revealed no difference comparing Ethicon manual circular staplers with Medtronic EEA (TM) circular staplers with Tri-Staple (TM) technology (risk ratio [RR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01) or comparing Medtronic EEA (TM) circular staplers with DST (TM) technology to Tri-Staple (TM) technology (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.53-1.06).ConclusionIn this analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing a left-sided colorectal surgery from a U.S. hospital database, the risk of AL observed with manual two-row circular staplers was similar to that seen with three-row devices. This study affirms the safety of manual two-row circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis.
引用
收藏
页数：16
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Preliminary evaluation of two-row versus three-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis after rectal resection: a single-center retrospective analysis
    Quero, Giuseppe
    Fiorillo, Claudio
    Menghi, Roberta
    Rosa, Fausto
    Massimiani, Giuseppe
    Schena, Carlo Alberto
    De Sio, Davide
    Laterza, Vito
    Lucinato, Chiara
    Papa, Valerio
    Tondolo, Vincenzo
    Alfieri, Sergio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (12) : 2501 - 2510
  • [22] Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: A proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer
    Rahbari, Nuh N.
    Weitz, Juergen
    Hohenberger, Werner
    Heald, Richard J.
    Moran, Brendan
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Holm, Torbjorn
    Wong, W. Douglas
    Tiret, Emmanuel
    Moriya, Yoshihiro
    Laurberg, Soren
    den Dulk, Marcel
    van de Velde, Cornelis
    Buechler, Markus W.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2010, 147 (03) : 339 - 351
  • [23] The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects:: Parallels with the design of randomized trials
    Rubin, Donald B.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) : 20 - 36
  • [24] Short-Term Outcomes of Tri-Staple Versus Universal Staple in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of Rectal and Distal Sigmoid Colonic Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis
    Sun, Qiang
    Wang, Anqi
    Wei, Shuxun
    Huang, Yu
    Lu, Hao
    Hu, Zhiqian
    Zhou, Haiyang
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 46 (11) : 2817 - 2824
  • [25] Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers
    Sylla, Patricia
    Sagar, Peter
    Johnston, Stephen S.
    Dwarakanathan, Harikumaran R.
    Waggoner, Jason R.
    Schwiers, Michael
    Roy, Sanjoy
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (04): : 2541 - 2553
  • [26] Matching on provider is risky
    Walker, Alexander M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (08) : S65 - S68
  • [27] Rehbein's anterior resection in Hirschsprung's disease, using a circular stapler
    Wester, T
    Hoehner, J
    Olsen, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1995, 5 (06) : 358 - 362
  • [28] REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF COMPARATIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES USING PROPENSITY SCORES
    Yue, Lilly Q.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2012, 22 (06) : 1272 - 1279
  • [29] Hospital costs associated with surgical morbidity after elective colorectal procedures: A retrospective observational cohort study in 530 patients
    Zoucas E.
    Lydrup M.-L.
    [J]. Patient Safety in Surgery, 8 (1)
123