Revisiting rebound effects of energy use and pollutant emissions: The role of technological change

被引:2
作者
Chen, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Min [1 ]
Li, Zeng [3 ]
Balezentis, Tomas [4 ]
Wang, Fang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geog, Guangdong Open Lab Geospatial Informat Technol & A, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Remote Sensing & Geog Infor, Guangzhou 510070, Peoples R China
[4] Lithuanian Inst Agrarian Econ, LT-03105 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Total-factor rebound effect; Pollutant emissions; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; CHINA; PRODUCTIVITY; EFFICIENCY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107202
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Measuring the rebound effect (RE) of energy use and pollutant emissions is fundamental to characterizing the effects of technological progress on energy conservation and emissions reduction. This paper presents a total -factor RE model that combines the Fixed effects (FE) model, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), and Luen-berger Productivity Indicator (LPI). The proposed model takes into account two types of disposability for variable-specific decomposition for LPI. The model includes two general indices, static inefficiency performance and dynamic inefficiency performance, which can be used to assess performance in the industrial sector and measure technological change and RE. The results show that switching from natural to managerial disposability improves energy RE by 12% but reduce RE of NOx and SO2 emissions by 22% and 24%, respectively. These findings suggest that cleaner energy expansion can promote energy RE, while reducing environmental RE.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Defining the rebound effect
    Berkhout, PHG
    Muskens, JC
    Velthuijsen, JW
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) : 425 - 432
  • [2] Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect?
    Binswanger, M
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (01) : 119 - 132
  • [3] Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach
    Chung, YH
    Fare, R
    Grosskopf, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) : 229 - 240
  • [4] BAM: a bounded adjusted measure of efficiency for use with bounded additive models
    Cooper, William W.
    Pastor, Jesus T.
    Borras, Fernando
    Aparicio, Juan
    Pastor, Diego
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2011, 35 (02) : 85 - 94
  • [5] Modelling transport emissions in an uncertain future: What actions make a difference?
    Craglia, Matteo
    Cullen, Jonathan
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 89
  • [6] Davidson R., 2004, Econometric theory and methods
  • [7] Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis
    Dong, Huijuan
    Dai, Hancheng
    Dong, Liang
    Fujita, Tsuyoshi
    Geng, Yong
    Klimont, Zbigniew
    Inoue, Tsuyoshi
    Bunya, Shintaro
    Fujii, Minoru
    Masui, Toshihiko
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 144 : 165 - 174
  • [8] Spatial analysis on China's regional air pollutants and CO2 emissions: emission pattern and regional disparity
    Dong, Liang
    Liang, Hanwei
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 92 : 280 - 291
  • [9] Evidence of direct and indirect rebound effect in households in EU-27 countries
    Freire-Gonzalez, Jaume
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 102 : 270 - 276
  • [10] How does ecological protection redline policy affect regional land use and ecosystem services?
    Guo, Xueyan
    Zhang, Yuxin
    Guo, Dongfang
    Lu, Wentao
    Xu, He
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 100