Group Polarization in Board Decisions about Strategic Change: Evidence from Chinese Publicly Listed Companies (2008-2018)

被引:3
作者
Zhang, Ming [1 ]
Ma, Xufei [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Weihong [4 ]
Lan, Hailin [1 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Univ, Nanning, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
board decisions; board versus CEO power; female directors; group polarization; group processes; strategic change; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; WOMEN DIRECTORS; ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE; SUPERVISORY BOARD; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MODERATING ROLE; PERSISTENCE; POWER; REPRESENTATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1017/mor.2022.58
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Strategic management scholars have shown increasing interest in explaining strategic change from the perspective of cognitive bias. However, most studies focus on individual cognitive bias but pay little attention to group cognitive bias. This study introduces a typical group cognitive bias (group polarization) to explain strategic change decisions made by the board of directors. Following the theory of group polarization, we argue that, when the average prior strategic change experienced in performance decline by board directors is relatively high (or low), the focal strategic change in performance decline will become even higher (or lower). We further contend that the proportion of female directors and board versus CEO power as the contingencies can mitigate this group polarization effect. Our hypotheses were strongly supported by a longitudinal sample of Chinese publicly listed companies during 2008-2018. The study's framework and findings contribute to the contextualization of social psychology research on group polarization in the study of board's strategic decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 232
页数:32
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   RESETTING THE CLOCK - THE DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE AND FAILURE [J].
AMBURGEY, TL ;
KELLY, D ;
BARNETT, WP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 38 (01) :51-73
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards
[3]   The culture of social comparison [J].
Baldwin, Matthew ;
Mussweiler, Thomas .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (39) :E9067-E9074
[4]   WEST MEETS EAST: NEW CONCEPTS AND THEORIES [J].
Barkema, Harry G. ;
Chen, Xiao-Ping ;
George, Gerard ;
Luo, Yadong ;
Tsui, Anne S. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 58 (02) :460-479
[5]  
Baron R.S., 2003, GROUP PROCESS GROUP
[6]   Social corroboration and opinion extremity [J].
Baron, RS ;
Hoppe, SI ;
Kao, CF ;
Brunsman, B ;
Linneweh, B ;
Rogers, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 32 (06) :537-560
[7]   Does the Team Leverage the Board's Decisions? [J].
Barroso Castro, Carmen ;
Dominguez-Concha, Marta ;
Vecino Gravel, Julio ;
Villegas Perinan, Ma Mar .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2009, 17 (06) :744-761
[8]   HOW DO CEO EMOTIONS MATTER? IMPACT OF CEO AFFECTIVE TRAITS ON STRATEGIC AND PERFORMANCE CONFORMITY IN THE SPANISH BANKING INDUSTRY [J].
Bautista Delgado-Garcia, Juan ;
Manuel De la Fuente-Sabate, Juan .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (05) :562-574
[9]  
Bilimoria D., 2000, Women corporate directors: Current research and future directions. Women in Management: Current Research Issues, VII, P138, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446219775.N10
[10]  
Blau P. M., 1977, Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure