Team Science Principles Enhance Cancer Care Delivery Quality Improvement: Interdisciplinary Implementation of Breast Cancer Screening Shared Decision Making

被引:3
作者
Burnside, Elizabeth S. S. [1 ,5 ]
Schrager, Sarina [1 ]
DuBenske, Lori [1 ]
Keevil, Jon [2 ]
Little, Terry [1 ]
Trentham-Dietz, Amy [1 ]
Rolland, Betsy [1 ]
Shah, Dhavan [3 ]
Alagoz, Oguzhan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[2] Hlth Decision Founder, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Coll Engn, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT; HEALTH; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT; WOMEN; COORDINATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; CREATIVITY; MANAGEMENT; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1200/OP.22.00355
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE:Implementing shared decision making (SDM), recommended in screening mammography by national guidelines for women age 40-49 years, faces challenges that innovations in quality improvement and team science (TS) are poised to address. We aimed to improve the effectiveness, patient-centeredness, and efficiency of SDM in primary care for breast cancer screening.METHODS:Our interdisciplinary team included primary and specialty care, psychology, epidemiology, communication science, engineering, and stakeholders (patients and clinicians). Over a 6-year period, we executed two iterative cycles of plan-do-study-act (PDSA) to develop, revise, and implement a SDM tool using TS principles. Patient and physician surveys and retrospective analysis of tool performance informed our first PDSA cycle. Patient and physician surveys, toolkit use, and clinical outcomes in the second PDSA cycle supported SDM implementation. We gathered team member assessments on the importance of individual TS activities.RESULTS:Our first PDSA cycle successfully generated a SDM tool called Breast Cancer Risk Estimator, deemed valuable by 87% of patients surveyed. Our second PDSA cycle increased Breast Cancer Risk Estimator utilization, from 2,000 sessions in 2017 to 4,097 sessions in 2019 while maintaining early-stage breast cancer diagnoses. Although TS activities such as culture, trust, and communication needed to be sustained throughout the project, shared goals, research/data infrastructure support, and leadership were more important earlier in the project and persisted in the later stages of the project.CONCLUSION:Combining rigorous quality improvement and TS principles can support the complex, interdependent, and interdisciplinary activities necessary to improve cancer care delivery exemplified by our implementation of a breast cancer screening SDM tool.
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E7
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Adelaine S., 2019, Predictive models: A toolkit to guide implementation
  • [2] Bennett L.M., 2018, COLLABORATION TEAM S
  • [3] Provision and Discussion of Survivorship Care Plans Among Cancer Survivors: Results of a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists and Primary Care Physicians
    Blanch-Hartigan, Danielle
    Forsythe, Laura P.
    Alfano, Catherine M.
    Smith, Tenbroeck
    Nekhlyudov, Larissa
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Rowland, Julia H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15) : 1578 - 1585
  • [4] The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review
    Brett, J
    Bankhead, C
    Henderson, B
    Watson, E
    Austoker, J
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 14 (11) : 917 - 938
  • [5] Systematic review: The long-term effects of false-positive mammograms
    Brewer, Noel T.
    Salz, Talya
    Lillie, Sarah E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 146 (07) : 502 - 510
  • [6] Repeated mammographic screening reduces breast cancer mortality along the continuum of age
    Broeders, MJM
    Verbeek, ALM
    Straatman, H
    Peer, PGM
    Jong, PCMPD
    Beex, LVAM
    Hendriks, JHCL
    Holland, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (04) : 163 - 167
  • [7] Age-based versus Risk-based Mammography Screening in Women 40-49 Years Old: A Cross-sectional Study
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Shafer, Christina M.
    Hampton, John M.
    Alagoz, Oguz
    Cox, Jennifer R.
    Mischo, Eric
    Schrager, Sarina B.
    Wilke, Lee G.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (02) : 321 - 328
  • [8] Transforming Evidence Generation to Support Health and Health Care Decisions
    Califf, Robert M.
    Robb, Melissa A.
    Bindman, Andrew B.
    Briggs, Josephine P.
    Collins, Francis S.
    Conway, Patrick H.
    Coster, Trinka S.
    Cunningham, Francesca E.
    De Lew, Nancy
    DeSalvo, Karen B.
    Dymek, Christine
    Dzau, Victor J.
    Fleurence, Rachael L.
    Frank, Richard G.
    Gaziano, Michael
    Kaufmann, Petra
    Lauer, Michael
    Marks, Peter W.
    McGinnis, J. Michael
    Richards, Chesley
    Selby, Joe V.
    Shulkin, David J.
    Shuren, Jeffrey
    Slavitt, Andrew M.
    Smith, Scott R.
    Washington, B. Vindell
    White, P. Jon
    Woodcock, Janet
    Woodson, Jonathan
    Sherman, Rachel E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (24) : 2395 - 2400
  • [9] Core Elements of Shared Decision-making for Women Considering Breast Cancer Screening: Results of a Modified Delphi Survey
    Croes, Kenneth D.
    Jones, Nathan R.
    DuBenske, Lori L.
    Schrager, Sarina B.
    Mahoney, Jane E.
    Little, Terry A.
    Burnside, Elizabeth S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (06) : 1668 - 1677
  • [10] Short-term impact of cancer prevention and screening activities on quality of life\
    Cullen, J
    Schwartz, MD
    Lawrence, WF
    Selby, JV
    Mandelblatt, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) : 943 - 952