Does Baseline Mental Health Influence Outcomes among Workers' Compensation Claimants Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

被引:3
|
作者
Patel, Madhav Rajesh [1 ]
Jacob, Kevin Chacko [1 ]
Amin, Kanhai S. [1 ]
Ribot, Max A. [1 ]
Pawlowski, Hanna [1 ]
Prabhu, Michael C. [1 ]
Vanjani, Nisheka Navin [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Scale; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Workers' compensation; Patientreported outcome measures; Minimal clinically important difference; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; IMPROVEMENTS; COSTS;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2021.0388
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Purpose: This study investigated the influence of preoperative mental health on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) among workers' compensation (WC) recipients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Overview of Literature: No studies have evaluated the impact of preoperative mental functioning on outcomes following MIS TLIF among WC claimants. Methods: WC recipients undergoing single-level MIS TLIF were identified. PROMs of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Physical and Mental Composite Scale (SF-12 PCS/MCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function evaluated subjects preoperatively/postoperatively. Subjects were grouped according to preoperative SF-12 MCS: <41 vs. >= 41. Demographic/perioperative variables, Delta PROMs, and MCID were compared using inferential statistics. Multiple regression was used to account for differences in spinal pathology. Results: The SF-12 MCS <41 and SF-12 MCS >= 41 groups included 48 and 45 patients, respectively. Significant differences in.PROMs were observed at SF-12 MCS at all timepoints, except at 6 months (p <= 0.041, all). The SF-12 MCS <41 group had worse preoperative to 6-months SF-12 MCS, 12-weeks/6-months VAS back, 12-week VAS leg, and preoperative to 6-months ODI (p <= 0.029, all). The SF-12 MCS <41 group had greater MCID achievement for overall ODI and 6-weeks/1-year/overall SF-12 MCS (p <= 0.043, all); the SF-12 MCS >= 41 group had greater attainment for 6-month VAS back (p=0.004). Conclusions: Poorer mental functioning adversely affected the baseline and intermediate postoperative quality-of-life outcomes pertaining to mental health, back pain, and disability among WC recipients undergoing lumbar fusion. However, outcomes did not differ 1-2 years after surgery. While MCID achievement for pain and physical function was largely unaffected by preoperative mental health score, WC recipients with poorer baseline mental health demonstrated higher rates of overall clinically meaningful improvements for disability and mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 108
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Two Techniques
    Tender, G. C.
    Serban, D.
    CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) : 812 - 821
  • [22] Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Bindal, Rajesh K.
    Ghosh, Subrata
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [23] Predictive Factors of Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Instrumentation
    Siemionow, Krzysztof
    Pelton, Miguel A.
    Hoskins, Jonathan A.
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (24) : 2046 - 2054
  • [24] Improvements in Back and Leg Pain Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (05) : 745 - 755
  • [25] Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
    Xie Lei
    Wu WenJian
    Liang Yu
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (16) : 1969 - 1986
  • [26] Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis
    Xie, Lei
    Wu, Wen-Jian
    Liang, Yu
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (16) : 1969 - +
  • [27] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Cost of a Surgeon's Learning Curve
    Garcia, Diogo
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Ruiz-Garcia, Henry
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.
    Dholakia, Ruchita
    Borah, Bijan
    Fox, W. Christopher
    Nottmeier, Eric
    Deen, H. Gordon
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Chen, Selby
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E1 - E7
  • [28] Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Hu, Xijian
    Yan, Lei
    Jin, Xinjie
    Liu, Haifeng
    Chai, Jing
    Zhao, Bin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 295 - 305
  • [29] Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation
    Isaacs, RE
    Podichetty, VK
    Santiago, P
    Sandhu, FA
    Spears, J
    Kelly, K
    Rice, L
    Fessler, RG
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (02) : 98 - 105
  • [30] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease
    Antonio Tsahtsarlis
    Martin Wood
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 2300 - 2305