Online Path Repair: Adapting to Robot Failures in Multi-Robot Aerial Surveys

被引:1
作者
Clark, Jaden [1 ]
Shah, Kunal [2 ]
Schwager, Mac [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Dexerity Inc, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
关键词
Robots; Surveys; Maintenance engineering; Batteries; Autonomous aerial vehicles; Planning; Routing; Multi-robot systems; motion and path planning; coverage planning; VEHICLE-ROUTING PROBLEM; DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1109/LRA.2024.3355730
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiple Unpiloted Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) working together have the potential to efficiently survey large geographical areas. Unfortunately, UAVs in the field may fail midway through a survey due to adverse weather, faster-than-expected battery drain, or mechanical malfunction, leaving part of the survey area uncovered. Here we propose an algorithm to re-plan coverage routes online for multiple UAVs to take over the remaining route of a failed team member. We first present a greedy path recovery algorithm whereby each UAV greedily absorbs the closest remaining vertices from the failed UAV's route into its own route. This method is then extended using a Tabu search method for multi-agent path repair to give successively better quality paths. We call the new path repair algorithm GRIT (Greedy Repair Initializes Tabu search), and demonstrate it performing path repair for nominal paths planned with both a traditional lawnmower-style planner and a more sophisticated integer program based planner. We show that GRIT achieves adequate re-plans 10-50 times faster than two benchmark planners, making it ideal for online path repair in mid-flight, although the benchmarks eventually outperform GRIT if given unlimited computation time.
引用
收藏
页码:2319 / 2326
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Decentralized Ergodic Control: Distribution-Driven Sensing and Exploration for Multiagent Systems [J].
Abraham, Ian ;
Murphey, Todd D. .
IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2018, 3 (04) :2987-2994
[2]   A location-routing problem with disruption risk [J].
Ahmadi-Javid, Amir ;
Seddighi, Amir Hossein .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2013, 53 :63-82
[3]  
Alami R., 2007, Autonomous Robotic Systems, P221
[4]   Survey on Coverage Path Planning with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles [J].
Cabreira, Taua M. ;
Brisolara, Lisane B. ;
Paulo R., Ferreira Jr. .
DRONES, 2019, 3 (01) :1-38
[5]  
Choset H., 1998, FIELD SERVICE ROBOTI, P203, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4471-1273-032, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-1273-0_32]
[6]   Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology [J].
Christie, Katherine S. ;
Gilbert, Sophie L. ;
Brown, Casey L. ;
Hatfield, Michael ;
Hanson, Leanne .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (05) :242-252
[7]  
Davids A, 2002, IEEE INTELL SYST, V17, P81, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2002.999224
[8]   Disruption management in vehicle routing and scheduling for road freight transport: a review [J].
Eglese, Richard ;
Zambirinis, Sofoclis .
TOP, 2018, 26 (01) :1-17
[9]  
Federal Aviation Administration, 2021, Part 107-Small Unmanned AircraftSystems, P900
[10]   Dec-PPCPP: A Decentralized Predator-Prey-based Approach to Adaptive Coverage Path Planning Amid Moving Obstacles [J].
Hassan, Mandi ;
Mustafic, Daut ;
Liu, Dikai .
2020 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2020, :11732-11739