The precursors of AI adoption in business: Towards an efficient decision-making and functional performance

被引:14
|
作者
Baabdullah, Abdullah M. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Econ & Adm, Dept Management Informat Syst, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
AI; Adoption; Decision -making efficiency; Functional performance; AI acceptance -avoidance model (IAAAM); IS professional distinctiveness; Saudi Arabia; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PERCEIVED DISTINCTIVENESS; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; EXTENDING UTAUT2; BROAD-BAND; INTELLIGENCE; ANALYTICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102745
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a highly effective solution for enhancing decision-making efficiency and optimising the functional performance of organisations. However, there have been limited attempts to assess the consequences of implementing AI systems on the quality and efficiency of decision-making. This study proposes and empirically examines an extended model covering all aspects that would shape the successful adoption of AI by decision-makers while investigating how the successful adoption of AI enhances the efficiency of the decisionmaking process. This study also intends to test the validity of the integrated AI acceptance-avoidance model (IAAAM) proposed by Cao et al. (2021) using the Middle East context (i.e. Saudi Arabia). The extended model of the current study was based on the IAAAM and IS professional distinctiveness (ISPD). Two quantitative studies were conducted to achieve the research objectives. The first study was conducted to validate the IAAAM using a purposive sample of employees (non-adopters of AI applications). The second study tested the proposed model using a purposive sample of employees (actual adopters). The structural equation modelling (SEM) results of the first study (non-adopters) supported the validity of the IAAAM in Saudi Arabia. Factors (performance expectancy (PE), facilitating conditions (FC), personal well-being concern (PWC), perceived threat (PT), and attitudes (ATT)) had a significant impact on either ATT or the intention to use AI. The SEM results of actual adopters supported the impact of PE, EE, FC, PWC, and ATT on either ATT or the adoption of AI (AoAI). As an external factor, the ISPD was the most significant predictor of AoAI. The AoAI was confirmed to strongly predict decision-making efficiency, which, in turn, contributes to functional performance. This study enriches the current understanding of the main factors that contribute to the successful implementation of AI systems, offering an in-depth understanding of both AI adopters and non-adopters. It identifies factors important to non-users to enhance future adoption, whereas current AI users focus on improving decision-making quality with the AI assistance.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Human Control and Discretion in AI-driven Decision-making in Government
    Mitrou, Lilian
    Janssen, Marijn
    Loukis, Euripidis
    14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE (ICEGOV 2021), 2021, : 10 - 16
  • [42] Human-AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem
    Puranam, Phanish
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATION DESIGN, 2021, 10 (02) : 75 - 80
  • [43] Information system capabilities and firm performance: Opening the black box through decision-making performance and business-process performance
    Aydiner, Arafat Salih
    Tatoglu, Ekrem
    Bayraktar, Erkan
    Zaim, Selim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 47 : 168 - 182
  • [44] Towards housing sustainability: a framework for the decision-making process of tenants
    Pagani, A.
    Binder, C. R.
    SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019 (SBE19 GRAZ), 2019, 323
  • [45] Improving the Decision-Making Process in the Higher Learning Institutions via Electronic Records Management System Adoption
    Mukred, Muaadh
    Yusof, Zawiyah M.
    Mokhtar, Umi Asma'
    Sadiq, Ali S.
    Hawash, Burkan
    Ahmed, Waleed Abdulkafi
    KSII TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 15 (01): : 90 - 113
  • [46] When is evidence sufficient for decision-making? A framework for understanding the pace of evidence adoption
    Dubois, Robert W.
    Lauer, Michael
    Perfetto, Eleanor
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (04) : 383 - 391
  • [47] The Influence of Risk Factors in Decision-Making Process for Open Source Software Adoption
    Silic, Mario
    Back, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2016, 15 (01) : 151 - 185
  • [48] NEW TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN AN INNOVATIVE MARKETPLACE - MICROLEVEL AND MACROLEVEL DECISION-MAKING MODELS
    BRIDGES, E
    COUGHLAN, AT
    KALISH, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1991, 7 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [49] Sharing decision-making and group incentives: The impact on performance
    Sesil, James C.
    ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY, 2006, 27 (04) : 587 - 607
  • [50] Mastering digital leadership capabilities for business model innovation: the role of managerial decision-making and grants
    Faiz, Misbah
    Sarwar, Naukhez
    Tariq, Adeel
    Memon, Mumtaz Ali
    JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 31 (03) : 574 - 597