The precursors of AI adoption in business: Towards an efficient decision-making and functional performance

被引:14
|
作者
Baabdullah, Abdullah M. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Econ & Adm, Dept Management Informat Syst, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
AI; Adoption; Decision -making efficiency; Functional performance; AI acceptance -avoidance model (IAAAM); IS professional distinctiveness; Saudi Arabia; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PERCEIVED DISTINCTIVENESS; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; EXTENDING UTAUT2; BROAD-BAND; INTELLIGENCE; ANALYTICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102745
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a highly effective solution for enhancing decision-making efficiency and optimising the functional performance of organisations. However, there have been limited attempts to assess the consequences of implementing AI systems on the quality and efficiency of decision-making. This study proposes and empirically examines an extended model covering all aspects that would shape the successful adoption of AI by decision-makers while investigating how the successful adoption of AI enhances the efficiency of the decisionmaking process. This study also intends to test the validity of the integrated AI acceptance-avoidance model (IAAAM) proposed by Cao et al. (2021) using the Middle East context (i.e. Saudi Arabia). The extended model of the current study was based on the IAAAM and IS professional distinctiveness (ISPD). Two quantitative studies were conducted to achieve the research objectives. The first study was conducted to validate the IAAAM using a purposive sample of employees (non-adopters of AI applications). The second study tested the proposed model using a purposive sample of employees (actual adopters). The structural equation modelling (SEM) results of the first study (non-adopters) supported the validity of the IAAAM in Saudi Arabia. Factors (performance expectancy (PE), facilitating conditions (FC), personal well-being concern (PWC), perceived threat (PT), and attitudes (ATT)) had a significant impact on either ATT or the intention to use AI. The SEM results of actual adopters supported the impact of PE, EE, FC, PWC, and ATT on either ATT or the adoption of AI (AoAI). As an external factor, the ISPD was the most significant predictor of AoAI. The AoAI was confirmed to strongly predict decision-making efficiency, which, in turn, contributes to functional performance. This study enriches the current understanding of the main factors that contribute to the successful implementation of AI systems, offering an in-depth understanding of both AI adopters and non-adopters. It identifies factors important to non-users to enhance future adoption, whereas current AI users focus on improving decision-making quality with the AI assistance.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Drivers of decision-making towards for digital transformation
    Ulrich, Klaus
    Guijarro-Garcia, Maria
    Pagan-Castano, Esther
    Nieto-Aleman, Paula
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2024,
  • [22] The Use of AI in Mental Health Services to Support Decision-Making: Scoping Review
    Auf, Hassan
    Svedberg, Petra
    Nygren, Jens
    Nair, Monika
    Lundgren, Lina E.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [23] AI-powered decision-making in facilitating insurance claim dispute resolution
    Zhang, Wen
    Shi, Jingwen
    Wang, Xiaojun
    Wynn, Henry
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023,
  • [24] Farmer characteristics and decision-making: A model for bioenergy crop adoption
    Burli, Pralhad H.
    Nguyen, Ruby T.
    Hartley, Damon S.
    Griffel, L. Michael
    Vazhnik, Veronika
    Lin, Yingqian
    ENERGY, 2021, 234
  • [25] The anchoring effect in business intelligence supported decision-making
    Ni, Feng
    Arnott, David
    Gao, Shijia
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2019, 28 (02) : 67 - 81
  • [26] The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs
    Pappas, Nikolaos
    Caputo, Andrea
    Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo
    Marzi, Giacomo
    Michopoulou, Eleni
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 131 : 573 - 583
  • [27] Simulation as a decision-making tool in a business analytics environment
    Ben Rabia, Mohamed Amine
    Bellabdaoui, Adil
    GOL'20: 2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (GOL), 2020, : 33 - 38
  • [28] Trusting AI: does uncertainty visualization affect decision-making?
    Reyes, Jonatan
    Batmaz, Anil Ufuk
    Kersten-Oertel, Marta
    FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2025, 7
  • [29] Business analytics-enabled decision-making effectiveness through knowledge absorptive capacity in health care
    Wang, Yichuan
    Byrd, Terry Anthony
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 21 (03) : 517 - 539
  • [30] Adoption of shared decision-making and clinical decision support for reducing cardiovascular disease risk in community health centers
    Hauschildt, Jennifer
    Lyon-Scott, Kristin
    Sheppler, Christina R.
    Larson, Annie E.
    McMullen, Carmit
    Boston, David
    O'Connor, Patrick J.
    Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
    Gold, Rachel
    JAMIA OPEN, 2023, 6 (01)