The precursors of AI adoption in business: Towards an efficient decision-making and functional performance

被引:14
|
作者
Baabdullah, Abdullah M. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Econ & Adm, Dept Management Informat Syst, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
关键词
AI; Adoption; Decision -making efficiency; Functional performance; AI acceptance -avoidance model (IAAAM); IS professional distinctiveness; Saudi Arabia; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PERCEIVED DISTINCTIVENESS; BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; EXTENDING UTAUT2; BROAD-BAND; INTELLIGENCE; ANALYTICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102745
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a highly effective solution for enhancing decision-making efficiency and optimising the functional performance of organisations. However, there have been limited attempts to assess the consequences of implementing AI systems on the quality and efficiency of decision-making. This study proposes and empirically examines an extended model covering all aspects that would shape the successful adoption of AI by decision-makers while investigating how the successful adoption of AI enhances the efficiency of the decisionmaking process. This study also intends to test the validity of the integrated AI acceptance-avoidance model (IAAAM) proposed by Cao et al. (2021) using the Middle East context (i.e. Saudi Arabia). The extended model of the current study was based on the IAAAM and IS professional distinctiveness (ISPD). Two quantitative studies were conducted to achieve the research objectives. The first study was conducted to validate the IAAAM using a purposive sample of employees (non-adopters of AI applications). The second study tested the proposed model using a purposive sample of employees (actual adopters). The structural equation modelling (SEM) results of the first study (non-adopters) supported the validity of the IAAAM in Saudi Arabia. Factors (performance expectancy (PE), facilitating conditions (FC), personal well-being concern (PWC), perceived threat (PT), and attitudes (ATT)) had a significant impact on either ATT or the intention to use AI. The SEM results of actual adopters supported the impact of PE, EE, FC, PWC, and ATT on either ATT or the adoption of AI (AoAI). As an external factor, the ISPD was the most significant predictor of AoAI. The AoAI was confirmed to strongly predict decision-making efficiency, which, in turn, contributes to functional performance. This study enriches the current understanding of the main factors that contribute to the successful implementation of AI systems, offering an in-depth understanding of both AI adopters and non-adopters. It identifies factors important to non-users to enhance future adoption, whereas current AI users focus on improving decision-making quality with the AI assistance.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Institutionalization of Business Intelligence for the Decision-Making Iteration
    Ali, Shaheb
    Islam, Rafiqul
    Rahman, Ferdausur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 15 (01) : 101 - 118
  • [2] The Impact of Business Intelligence and Analytics Adoption on Decision Making Effectiveness and Managerial Work Performance
    Hurbean, Luminita
    Militaru, Florin
    Muntean, Mihaela
    Danaiata, Doina
    SCIENTIFIC ANNALS OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2023, 70 : 43 - 54
  • [3] Big data and decision-making in international business
    Ulman, Milos
    Musteen, Martina
    Kanska, Eva
    THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 63 (05) : 597 - 606
  • [4] Review of IT/IS Adoption and Decision-Making Behavior in Small Businesses
    杨小平
    付静
    Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2008, (03) : 323 - 328
  • [5] Challenges of Transition to Paperless Management: Readiness of Incorporating AI in Decision-making Processes
    Gelashvili, Teona
    Pappel, Ingrid
    2021 EIGHT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDEMOCRACY & EGOVERNMENT (ICEDEG), 2021, : 41 - 46
  • [6] How business intelligence capability impacts decision-making speed, comprehensiveness, and firm performance
    Alzghoul, Amro
    Khaddam, Amineh A.
    Abousweilem, Fayrouz
    Irtaimeh, Hani J.
    Alshaar, Qasem
    INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 40 (02) : 220 - 233
  • [7] Improving environmental decision-making in environmental business-management using big data and AI
    Vagin, Sergei G.
    Klimenko, Viktor A.
    Telegina, Zhanna A.
    Aleksashina, Tatiana, V
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [8] A Patient's Perspective on Decision-making for the Adoption of Digital Care Pathways
    Abbas, Raja Manzar
    Carroll, Noel
    Richardson, Ita
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 5: HEALTHINF, 2020, : 447 - 454
  • [9] Differences in decision-making criteria towards the return on marketing investment: A project business perspective
    Smyth, Hedley
    Lecoeuvre, Laurence
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [10] Transforming decision-making processes: a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organisations
    Sharma, Rajeev
    Mithas, Sunil
    Kankanhalli, Atreyi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 23 (04) : 433 - 441