Patterns of Postpartum Primary Care Follow-up and Diabetes-Related Care After Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes

被引:26
作者
D'Amico, Rachel [1 ]
Dalmacy, Djhenne [2 ]
Akinduro, Jenifer A. [3 ]
Hyer, Madison [2 ]
Thung, Stephen [4 ]
Mao, Shengyi [1 ]
Fareed, Naleef [2 ]
Bose-Brill, Seuli [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bloomington, IN USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
WOMEN; PREDICTORS; PREGNANCY; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54765
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Gestational diabetes (GD) affects up to 10% of pregnancies and increases lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes 10-fold; postpartum diabetes evaluation and primary care follow-up are critical in preventing and detecting type 2 diabetes. Despite clinical guidelines recommending universal follow-up, little remains known about how often individuals with GD access primary care and type 2 diabetes screening. OBJECTIVE To describe patterns of primary care follow-up and diabetes-related care among individuals with and without GD in the first year post partum. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used a private insurance claims database to compare follow-up in the first year post partum between individuals with GD, type 2 diabetes, and no diabetes diagnosis. Participants included postpartum individuals aged 15 to 51 years who delivered between 2015 and 2018 and had continuous enrollment from 180 days before to 366 days after the delivery date. Data were analyzed September through October 2021 and reanalyzed November 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary care follow-up visits and diabetes-related care (blood glucose testing and diabetes-associated visit diagnoses) were determined by evaluation and management, Current Procedural Terminology, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes, respectively. RESULTS A total of 280 131 individuals were identified between 2015 and 2018 (mean age: 31 years; 95% CI, 27-34 years); 12 242 (4.4%) had preexisting type 2 diabetes and 18 432 (6.6%) had GD. A total of 50.9%(95% CI, 49.9%-52.0%) of individuals with GD had primary care follow-up, compared with 67.2%(95% CI, 66.2%-68.2%) of individuals with preexisting type 2 diabetes. A total of 36.2% (95% CI, 35.1%-37.4%) of individuals with GD had diabetes-related care compared with 56.9%(95% CI, 55.7%-58.0%) of individuals with preexisting diabetes. Only 36.0%(95% CI, 34.4%-37.6%) of individuals with GD connected with primary care received clinical guideline concordant care with blood glucose testing 12 weeks post partum. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of postpartum individuals, individuals with GD had lower rates of primary care and diabetes-related care compared with those with preexisting type 2 diabetes, and only 36% of those with GD received guideline-recommended blood glucose testing in the first 12 weeks post partum. This illustrates a missed opportunity for early intervention in diabetes surveillance and prevention and demonstrates the need to develop a multidisciplinary approach for postpartum follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   14. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 :S200-S210
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, INT CAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Obstet Gynecol, V131, pe49, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501
[4]   Follow-up after gestational diabetes: a fixable gap in women's preventive healthcare [J].
Bernstein, Judith Apt ;
Quinn, Emily ;
Ameli, Omid ;
Craig, Myrita ;
Heeren, Timothy ;
Lee-Parritz, Aviva ;
Iverson, Ronald ;
Jack, Brian ;
McCloskey, Lois .
BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2017, 5 (01)
[5]   Mother-Infant Dyad program in primary care: evidence-based postpartum care following gestational diabetes [J].
Brill, Seuli Bose ;
May, Sara ;
Lorenz, Allison M. ;
Spence, Douglas ;
Prater, Laura ;
Shellhaas, Cynthia ;
Otsubo, Masami ;
Mao, Shengyi ;
Flanigan, Matthew ;
Thung, Stephen ;
Leonard, Melissa ;
Jiang, Fei ;
Oza-Frank, Reena .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25) :9336-9341
[6]   Predictors of Low Uptake of Prenatal Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Immunization in Privately Insured Women in the United States [J].
Butler, Anne M. ;
Layton, J. Bradley ;
Li, Dongmei ;
Hudgens, Michael G. ;
Boggess, Kim A. ;
McGrath, Leah J. ;
Weber, David J. ;
Becker-Dreps, Sylvia .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (04) :629-637
[7]   Early versus 6-12 week postpartum glucose tolerance testing for women with gestational diabetes [J].
Carter, E. B. ;
Martin, S. ;
Temming, L. A. ;
Colditz, G. A. ;
Macones, G. A. ;
Tuuli, M. G. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) :118-121
[8]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2020, MED PROGR DUR MED EQ
[9]   Managing gestational diabetes [J].
Dugan, Joy A. ;
Ma-Crawford, Julianna .
JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2019, 32 (09) :21-25
[10]   Association of Insurance Status With Provision of Recommended Services During Comprehensive Postpartum Visits [J].
Geissler, Kimberley ;
Ranchoff, Brittany L. ;
Cooper, Michael I. ;
Attanasio, Laura B. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (11)