Human Rights in Sports Arbitration: What Should the Court of Arbitration for Sport do for Protecting Human Rights in Sports?

Sports governing bodies establish their sporting rules and regulations. Nevertheless, they confront a complex question concerning whether a female athlete who inherently possesses an advantageous quantity of testosterone may participate in female athletic competitions. In Caster Semenya and Athletics South Africa (ASA) v. IAAF, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) held that she could not participate in female sports events because "the elevated testosterone levels that such athletes possess can create an insuperable advantage over other female athletes who do not have a 46 XY DSD condition". Consequently, the CAS ruled that she would no longer be eligible to compete in professional female competitions. In this scenario, the primary focus of this article is to examine how the CAS should address human rights-related issues, even though it is not a human rights court like the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) but rather an arbitral tribunal. To achieve this purpose, this article will address the following questions: (1) How can athletes claim a violation of their human rights before the CAS?; and (2) What steps should the CAS take to safeguard human rights in sports? Through this research, it may serve to identify the CAS's role in human rights protection in sports.