Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Publications in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Research Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database

被引:6
作者
Hockett, Diana [1 ]
Rabinowitz, Judy B. [2 ]
Kwon, Yong K. [3 ]
Joseph, Bellal [4 ]
Kaafarani, Haytham [5 ]
Aziz, Hassan [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med Hockett, Boston, MA USA
[2] Tufts Univ Rabinowitz, Hirsh Hlth Sci Lib, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Div Trauma, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Trauma, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Iowa Hosp &Clin, Div Transplant & Hepatobiliary Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[7] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, 200 Hawkins ,C41-S GH, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; ADHERENCE; STANDARDS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1097/XCS.0000000000000477
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The use of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP has increased in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery (HPB) research as it provides access to high-quality surgical outcome data on a national scale. Using the ACS NSQIP database, this study examined the methodologic reporting of HPB publications. STUDY DESIGN: Web of Science core collection (all editions) was queried for all HPB studies using the ACS NSQIP database published between 2004 and 2022. In addition, a critical appraisal was performed using the JAMA Surgery checklist, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, and Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) statement. RESULTS: In total, 276 studies were included in the analysis. The median scores for the JAMA Surgery checklist, RECORD statement, and STROBE statement were 4 of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 3 to 5), 3 of 10 (IQR 2 to 4), and 15 of 21 (IQR 13 to 17), respectively. The criteria with the highest rates of nonadherence were discussing competing risks, clear definitions of inclusion and exclusion criteria, unadjusted and adjusted outcomes, provision of supplementary data, and performing subgroup analyses. Additionally, when examining checklist fulfillment of hepatobiliary studies and pancreatic studies separately, pancreatic studies demonstrated significantly greater fulfillment of the STROBE statement checklist items. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory reporting of methodology is present among HPB studies utilizing the ACS NSQIP database, with multiple opportunities for improvement. Areas for improved adherence include discussing competing risks, providing supplementary information, and performing appropriate subgroup analysis. Given the increasing role of large-scale databases in surgical research, enhanced commitment to reporting guidelines may advance HPB research and ensure quality reporting. (c) 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 460
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ACS American College of Surgeons, NAT SURG QUAL IMPR P
[2]   Journal impact factor and methodological quality of surgical randomized controlled trials: an empirical study [J].
Ali, Usama Ahmed ;
Reiber, Beata M. M. ;
ten Hove, Joren R. ;
van der Sluis, Pieter C. ;
Gooszen, Hein G. ;
Boermeester, Marja A. ;
Besselink, Marc G. .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2017, 402 (07) :1015-1022
[3]   Does Chronic Use of Steroids Affect Outcomes After Liver Resection? Analysis of a National Database [J].
Aziz, Hassan ;
Kwon, Ye In Christopher ;
Alvi, Saba ;
Ahmad, Shahzaib ;
Ganguli, Sangrag ;
Goodman, Martin ;
Kwon, Yong K. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (10) :2093-2100
[4]  
Aziz Hassan, 2020, Cancer Med J, V3, P6
[5]   Standards of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general surgery - Can we do better? [J].
Balasubramanian, Sabapathy P. ;
Wiener, Martin ;
Alshameeri, Zeiad ;
Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath ;
Elbourne, Diana ;
Reed, Malcolm W. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (05) :663-667
[6]  
Beyranvand Tina, 2019, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V33, P129, DOI 10.34171/mjiri.33.129
[7]   Development and Evaluation of the Universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: A Decision Aid and Informed Consent Tool for Patients and Surgeons [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Liu, Yaoming ;
Paruch, Jennifer L. ;
Zhou, Lynn ;
Kmiecik, Thomas E. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Cohen, Mark E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) :833-+
[8]   Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol [J].
Blanco, David ;
Kirkham, Jamie J. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Moher, David ;
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Cobo, Erik .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (11)
[9]   Methodological and Ethical Quality of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials in Gastrointestinal Surgery [J].
Bridoux, Valerie ;
Moutel, Gregoire ;
Roman, Horace ;
Kianifard, Babak ;
Michot, Francis ;
Herve, Christian ;
Tuech, Jean-Jacques .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (09) :1758-1767
[10]  
Clarivate, Journal citation reports