Evaluating barriers and strategies to sustainable supply chain risk management in the context of an emerging economy

被引:18
作者
Reshad, Aquib Irteza [1 ]
Biswas, Tasnia [1 ]
Agarwal, Renu [2 ]
Paul, Sanjoy Kumar [2 ]
Azeem, Abdullahil [1 ]
机构
[1] Bangladesh Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Ind & Prod Engn, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, UTS Business Sch, Sydney, Australia
关键词
barriers; risk management; strategies; sustainable supply chain; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY AHP; CONSTRUCTION FIRMS; EXTENDED VIKOR; SELECTION; INDUSTRY; IMPLEMENTATION; FRAMEWORK; DRIVERS; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3367
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With increasing awareness about society and the environment, industries are urged to develop and implement sustainable supply chain (SSC) processes. However, the risk of non-compliance against these SSC processes to manage overall business risks, namely, avoiding reputational damage and managing financial losses, is increasingly receiving senior management attention. Given these shortcomings, the objective of this research is twofold, namely, (i) to identify and evaluate barriers adopting sustainable supply chain risk management (SSCRM) processes and (ii) to prioritize SSCRM strategies to overcome these barriers in an emerging economy, namely, Bangladesh. To achieve the objectives, this study develops a framework by integrating the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and VIsekriterijumska optimizacija i KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR). The results show that the "information-related barriers" are most prevalent among the categories of barriers, and "lack of coordination and collaboration" has been identified as the most significant barrier. Evaluating the strategies, "top management commitment" is the best strategy. These findings can help managers develop strategies to overcome the most significant barriers to adopting SSCRM. The proposed framework, which integrates quantitative and qualitative approaches, can be used by decision-makers to make accurate, prompt, and systematic decisions compliant with SSCRM business processes.
引用
收藏
页码:4315 / 4334
页数:20
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   A novel plithogenic TOPSIS- CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management [J].
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;
Mohamed, Rehab .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
[2]   Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method [J].
Ahmad, Wan Nurul Karimah Wan ;
Rezaei, Jafar ;
Sadaghiani, Saman ;
Tavasszy, Lorant A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 153 (01) :242-252
[3]   Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method [J].
Ahmadi, Hadi Badri ;
Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov ;
Rezaei, Jafar .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 126 :99-106
[4]   The Effects of Some Risk Factors in the Supply Chains Performance: A Case of Study [J].
Avelar-Sosa, L. ;
Garcia-Alcaraz, J. L. ;
Castrellon-Torres, J. P. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 12 (05) :958-968
[5]   Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Govindan, Kannan ;
Gold, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 195 :106-117
[6]   Integrating and extending data and decision tools for sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 110 :188-207
[7]   The relationship between training and organizational commitment among academicians in Malaysia [J].
Bashir, Nouruddeen ;
Long, Choi Sang .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 34 (10) :1227-1245
[8]  
Biswal Jitendra Narayan, 2017, International Journal of Procurement Management, V10, P411
[9]   Supply chain risk management in financial crises-A multiple case-study approach [J].
Blome, Constantin ;
Schoenherr, Tobias .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2011, 134 (01) :43-57
[10]   Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions [J].
Carter, Craig R. ;
Easton, P. Liane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 41 (01) :46-62