Effects of driving style on takeover performance during automated driving: Under the influence of warning system factors

被引:3
作者
Zhang, Yaping [1 ]
Ma, Qianli [1 ]
Qu, Jianhong [1 ]
Zhou, Ronggang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Key Lab Complex Syst Anal Management & Decis, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Automated driving; Drivers ' driving style; Takeover performance; Warning stage; Warning information; SITUATION AWARENESS; DRIVER TAKEOVER; TIME; REQUESTS; VEHICLE; BACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104229
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Driving style has been proposed to be a critical factor in automated driving. However, the role of driving style in the process of taking over during automated driving needs further investigation. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of driving style on takeover performance under the influence of warning system factors. In addition, this study also explored whether the impact of driving style on reaction time varies over time and the role of driving style on a comprehensive takeover quality indicator. Two driving simulation experiments with different takeover request (TOR) designs were conducted. In experiment 1, content warning information was provided in the TOR with different warning stage designs; in experiment 2, countdown warning information was provided in the TOR with different warning stage designs. Sixty-four participants (32 for experiment 1 and 32 for experiment 2) were classified into two groups based on their driving style (i.e., aggressive, or defensive) using the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (the brief MDSI-C). The results suggested that drivers' driving style had significant effects on takeover performance, but the effects were influenced by warning system designs. Specifically, defensive participants performed better takeover performance, i.e., shorter reaction time and cautious vehicle control behaviors, than aggressive participants in most warning conditions. The content and countdown warning information and warning stage design affected the roles of driving style on takeover performance: 1) compared to the one-stage warning design, the two-stage warning design significantly shortened the reaction time of the participants with different driving styles, 2) compared to the countdown warning information design, the design of content warning information can shorten the reaction time of aggressive participants and lengthen the reaction time of defensive participants in the two-stage warning conditions, and 3) compared to the content warning information design, countdown warning information can improve the safe takeover performance of defensive participants. This study provides a better understanding of the role of driving style on takeover performance, and driving style should be considered when designing warning systems for autonomous vehicles.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring takeover performance in different driving scenarios: Considering the influence of non-driving-related tasks and takeover request lead time
    Gong, Jianguo
    Guo, Xiucheng
    Qi, Cong
    Liang, Xiaoxi
    Wang, Qiuhong
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 97 : 411 - 421
  • [42] Effects of Distraction in On-Road Level 2 Automated Driving: Impacts on Glance Behavior and Takeover Performance
    Yang, Shiyan
    Kuo, Jonny
    Lenne, Michael G.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2021, 63 (08) : 1485 - 1497
  • [43] Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality
    Naujoks, Frederik
    Purucker, Christian
    Wiedemann, Katharina
    Marberger, Claus
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2019, 61 (04) : 596 - 613
  • [44] Speech-based takeover requests in conditionally automated driving: Effects of different voices on the driver takeover performance
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhou, Ronggang
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2022, 101
  • [45] How do visual and cognitive non-driving related tasks affect drivers' visual attention and takeover performance in conditionally automated driving?
    Pan, Hengyan
    Payre, William
    Wang, Yonggang
    Gao, Zhixiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2025, 17 (01) : 97 - 123
  • [46] Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving
    Liang, Nade
    Yang, Jing
    Yu, Denny
    Prakah-Asante, Kwaku O.
    Curry, Reates
    Blommer, Mike
    Swaminathan, Radhakrishnan
    Pitts, Brandon J.
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 157
  • [47] Understanding trust calibration in automated driving: the effect of time, personality, and system warning design
    Qu, Jianhong
    Zhou, Ronggang
    Zhang, Yaping
    Ma, Qianli
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2023, 66 (12) : 2165 - 2181
  • [48] Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up
    Woerle, Johanna
    Metz, Barbara
    Othersen, Ina
    Baumann, Martin
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 144 (144)
  • [49] Driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving: sudden system failure situation versus ODD exit situation
    Yao H.
    An S.
    Zhou H.
    Itoh M.
    [J]. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration, 2021, 14 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [50] A Dataset on Takeover during Distracted L2 Automated Driving
    Hwang, Jiwoo
    Choi, Woohyeok
    Lee, Jungmin
    Kim, Woojoo
    Rhim, Jungwook
    Kim, Auk
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2025, 12 (01)