Model-based standardization using multiple imputation

被引:2
作者
Remiro-Azocar, Antonio [1 ]
Heath, Anna [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Baio, Gianluca [4 ]
机构
[1] Bayer plc, Stat & Data Insights, 400 South Oak Way, Reading, England
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 115 Coll St, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London, England
关键词
Standardization; Marginalization; Multiple imputation; Parametric G-computation; Covariate adjustment; Indirect treatment comparisons; PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; TARGET ESTIMANDS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; POPULATION; PERFORMANCE; COLLAPSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-024-02157-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWhen studying the association between treatment and a clinical outcome, a parametric multivariable model of the conditional outcome expectation is often used to adjust for covariates. The treatment coefficient of the outcome model targets a conditional treatment effect. Model-based standardization is typically applied to average the model predictions over the target covariate distribution, and generate a covariate-adjusted estimate of the marginal treatment effect.MethodsThe standard approach to model-based standardization involves maximum-likelihood estimation and use of the non-parametric bootstrap. We introduce a novel, general-purpose, model-based standardization method based on multiple imputation that is easily applicable when the outcome model is a generalized linear model. We term our proposed approach multiple imputation marginalization (MIM). MIM consists of two main stages: the generation of synthetic datasets and their analysis. MIM accommodates a Bayesian statistical framework, which naturally allows for the principled propagation of uncertainty, integrates the analysis into a probabilistic framework, and allows for the incorporation of prior evidence.ResultsWe conduct a simulation study to benchmark the finite-sample performance of MIM in conjunction with a parametric outcome model. The simulations provide proof-of-principle in scenarios with binary outcomes, continuous-valued covariates, a logistic outcome model and the marginal log odds ratio as the target effect measure. When parametric modeling assumptions hold, MIM yields unbiased estimation in the target covariate distribution, valid coverage rates, and similar precision and efficiency than the standard approach to model-based standardization.ConclusionWe demonstrate that multiple imputation can be used to marginalize over a target covariate distribution, providing appropriate inference with a correctly specified parametric outcome model and offering statistical performance comparable to that of the standard approach to model-based standardization.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Journal of Official Statistics
[2]   The performance of two data-generation processes for data with specified marginal treatment odds ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Stafford, James .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2008, 37 (06) :1039-1051
[3]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (16) :3078-3094
[4]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (16) :2837-2849
[5]   An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (03) :399-424
[6]   Absolute risk reductions, relative risks, relative risk reductions, and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from a logistic regression model [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (01) :2-6
[7]   Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language [J].
Carpenter, Bob ;
Gelman, Andrew ;
Hoffman, Matthew D. ;
Lee, Daniel ;
Goodrich, Ben ;
Betancourt, Michael ;
Brubaker, Marcus A. ;
Guo, Jiqiang ;
Li, Peter ;
Riddell, Allen .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2017, 76 (01) :1-29
[8]   Extending inferences from a randomized trial to a new target population [J].
Dahabreh, Issa J. ;
Robertson, Sarah E. ;
Steingrimsson, Jon A. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. ;
Hernan, Miguel A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (14) :1999-2014
[9]   Extending inferences from a randomized trial to a target population [J].
Dahabreh, Issa J. ;
Hernan, Miguel A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (08) :719-722
[10]   Making apples from oranges: Comparing noncollapsible effect estimators and their standard errors after adjustment for different covariate sets [J].
Daniel, Rhian ;
Zhang, Jingjing ;
Farewell, Daniel .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 63 (03) :528-557