Development and Validation of the Attitudes towards Social Robots Scale

被引:0
作者
Niewrzol, Daniel B. [1 ]
Ostermann, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Dept Psychol & Psychotherapy, D-58452 Witten, Germany
关键词
social robots; attitudes; survey; questionnaire; validation; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; COMMON FACTOR-ANALYSIS; NEGATIVE ATTITUDES; RECOMMENDATIONS; NUMBER; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12030286
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The idea of artificially created social robots has a long tradition. Today, attitudes towards robots play a central role in the field of healthcare. Our research aimed to develop a scale to measure attitudes towards robots. The survey consisted of nine questions on attitudes towards robots, sociodemographic questions, the SWOP-K9, measuring self-efficacy, optimism, and pessimism, and the BFI-10, measuring personality dimensions. Structural relations between the items were detected using principal components analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation. Correlations and Analysis of Variance were used for external validation. In total, 214 participants (56.1% female, mean age: 30.8 +/- 14.4 years) completed the survey. The PCA found two main components, "Robot as a helper and assistant" (RoHeA) and "Robot as an equal partner" (RoEqP), with four items each explaining 53.2% and 17.5% of the variance with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.915 and 0.768. In the personality traits, "Conscientiousness" correlated weakly with both subscales and "Extraversion" correlated with RoHeA, while none the subscales of the SWOP-K9 significantly correlated with RoEqP or RoHeA. Male participants scored significantly higher than female participants. Our survey yielded a stable and convergent two-factor instrument that exhibited convincing validity and complements other findings in the field. The ASRS can easily be used to describe attitudes towards social robots in human society. Further research, however, should be carried out to investigate the discriminant and convergent validity of the ASRS.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Al-Razgan M., 2016, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, V5, P129, DOI [10.18178/ijmerr.5.2.129-132, DOI 10.18178/ijmerr.5.2.129-132]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JT.5740104
[3]  
Arras K.O., 2005, Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? a 2000 people survey
[4]  
Attig C., 2017, HCI International 2017 - posters'extended abstracts, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58750-93, 10.1007/978-3-319-58750-9_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58750-9_3]
[5]  
Beavers AS, 2013, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, V18, P1, DOI DOI 10.7275/QV2Q-RK76
[6]  
Boesl DBO, 2016, 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIETIES (EMERGITECH), P417, DOI 10.1109/EmergiTech.2016.7737377
[7]   Animates are better remembered than inanimates: further evidence from word and picture stimuli [J].
Bonin, Patrick ;
Gelin, Margaux ;
Bugaiska, Aurelia .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2014, 42 (03) :370-382
[8]   Social robots: Beyond tools to partners [J].
Breazeal, C ;
Gray, J ;
Hoffman, G ;
Berlin, M .
RO-MAN 2004: 13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, :551-556
[9]   Attitudes and Reactions to a Healthcare Robot [J].
Broadbent, Elizabeth ;
Kuo, I. Han ;
Lee, Yong In ;
Rabindran, Joel ;
Kerse, Ngaire ;
Stafford, Rebecca ;
MacDonald, Bruce A. .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2010, 16 (05) :608-613
[10]   Human-Robot Collaboration Acceptance Model: Development and Comparison for Germany, Japan, China and the USA [J].
Broehl, Christina ;
Nelles, Jochen ;
Brandl, Christopher ;
Mertens, Alexander ;
Nitsch, Verena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2019, 11 (05) :709-726