Discrimination Power of Short Essay Questions Versus Multiple Choice Questions as an Assessment Tool in Clinical Biochemistry

被引:1
作者
Eldakhakhny, Basmah [1 ]
Elsamanoudy, Ayman Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Clinical Biochem, Fac Med, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Med, Med Biochem & Mol Biol, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
difficulty index; discrimination factor; clinical biochemistry; multiple-choice questions; short essay; MBBS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.35427
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Assessment is fundamental to the educational process. Multiple choice questions (MCQs) and short essay questions (SEQs) are the most widely used assessment method in medical school. The current study evaluated the discriminating value of SEQs compared to MCQs as assessment tools in clinical biochemistry and correlated undergraduate students' SEQ scores with their overall scores during the academic years 2021-2022 and 2022-2023. This is a descriptive-analytical study in which MCQ and SEQ papers of clinical biochemistry were analyzed. The mean score for SEQs in males was 66.7 ?? 1.2 and for females it was 64.0 ?? 1.1 SEM, with a p-value of 0.09; for MCQs, the mean score for males was 68.5 ?? 0.9 SEM and for females it was 72.6 ?? 0.8. When analyzing the difficulty index (DI) and discrimination factor (DF) of the questions, MCQs have a mean DI of 0.70 ?? 0.01,and DF of 0.05 to 0.6. SEQs have a mean DI of 0.73 ?? 0.03 and DF of 0.68 ?? 0.01; there was a significant difference between the DF of MCQs and SEQs (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, there was a significant difference between SEQs and MCQs when categorizing students based on their scores, except for A-scored students. According to the current study, SEQs have a higher discriminating ability than MCQs and help differentiate high-achieving students from low-achieving students.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Aalaei S, 2016, INT J ADV BIOTECHNOL, V7, P1674
[2]  
Abdel-Hameed AA, 2005, SAUDI MED J, V26, P1505
[3]  
Amin Z., 2009, Basics in medical education, V2, DOI [10.1142/7044, DOI 10.1142/7044]
[4]  
Baig M, 2014, PAK J MED SCI, V30, P3, DOI 10.12669/pjms.301.4458
[5]  
Demirci N, 2008, ESSAYS ED, V24, P5
[6]  
Downing S.M., 1992, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V11, P27
[7]   Medical education - Assessment in medical education [J].
Epstein, Ronald M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (04) :387-396
[8]   Should essays and other open-ended -type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine? [J].
Hift, Richard J. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 14
[9]  
Jaleel A, 2020, PROFESSIONAL MED J, V27, P2749, DOI [10.29309/tpmj/2020.27.12.4474, DOI 10.29309/TPMJ/2020.27.12.4474]
[10]  
-Jaleel A., 2020, BioMedica, V36, P193, DOI [10.51441/biomedica/5-136, DOI 10.51441/BIOMEDICA/5-136]