OFMSW Fermentation with Different Inocula and Its Effects on Methane Production

被引:3
作者
Jojoa-Unigarro, G. Dimitriv [1 ]
Gonzalez-Martinez, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Natl Univ Mexico, Inst Engn, Mexico City, Mexico
关键词
Alcoholic fermentation; Lactic fermentation; Anaerobic digestion; Methane production; FATTY-ACIDS PRODUCTION; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; FOOD WASTE; SINGLE-PHASE; ETHANOL; FRUIT; PH; HYDROLYSIS; PREFERMENTATION; ACIDIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12649-022-01968-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Thermodynamically, lactic acid and ethanol allow the best energy recovery among all common metabolites for methane production. The main objective of this work was to favor the fermentation of OFMSW for better lactic acid and ethanol production. Methods As a first step, OFMSW was fermented using two different inocula: Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and anaerobic granular sludge from a UASB wastewater treatment plant. The naturally occurring microorganisms in OFMSW were always present and active. The second step was the methanization of digestates from the previously mentioned fermentations. Results OFMSW fermentation with NOM and anaerobic granular sludge + NOM mainly produced lactic acid; yeast fermentation produced ethanol, lactic acid, and volatile fatty acids. Methane production from the fermentation digestates increased with decreasing substrate concentration, and higher methane production was obtained with the digestate from NOM fermentation. Higher concentrations of propionic and butyric acids were observed for higher digestate concentrations from yeast and NOM after 30-day methanization. Conclusion Every one of the fermented digestates produced more methane than unfermented OFMSW. Methane produced from unfermented OFMSW was not inhibited as propionic, and butyric acid concentrations were the lowest of all four cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1476
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V21st
[2]  
ASTM International, 2016, D523192 ASTM
[3]   Comparison of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and activated sludge for hydrogen and methane production [J].
Baldi, F. ;
Pecorini, I. ;
Lannelli, R. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 143 :1755-1765
[4]  
Batstone DJ, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V45, P65
[5]   New insights in food waste, sewage sludge and green waste anaerobic fermentation for short-chain volatile fatty acids production: A review [J].
Battista, Federico ;
Strazzera, Giuseppe ;
Valentino, Francesco ;
Gottardo, Marco ;
Villano, Marianna ;
Matos, Mariana ;
Silva, Fernando ;
Reis, Maria. A. M. ;
Mata-Alvarez, Joan ;
Astals, Sergi ;
Dosta, Joan ;
Jones, Rhys Jon ;
Massanet-Nicolau, Jaime ;
Guwy, Alan ;
Pavan, Paolo ;
Bolzonella, David ;
Majone, Mauro .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (05)
[6]   Spectrophotometric determination of lactic acid [J].
Borshchevskaya, L. N. ;
Gordeeva, T. L. ;
Kalinina, A. N. ;
Sineokii, S. P. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 71 (08) :755-758
[7]   Two-phases anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: bioreactors performance [J].
Bouallagui, H ;
Torrijos, A ;
Godon, JJ ;
Moletta, R ;
Ben Cheikh, R ;
Touhami, Y ;
Delgenes, JP ;
Di, AH .
BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (02) :193-197
[8]   Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition [J].
Bouallagui, H. ;
Lahdheb, H. ;
Ben Romdan, E. ;
Rachdi, B. ;
Hamdi, M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (05) :1844-1849
[9]   Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review [J].
Campuzano, Rosalinda ;
Gonzalez-Martinez, Simon .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 54 :3-12
[10]   Silage of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste to improve methane production [J].
Castellon-Zelaya, Mario F. ;
Gonzalez-Martinez, Simon .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 83 (10) :2536-2548