The Corporate Economic Influence and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China

被引:2
作者
Guo, Lan [1 ]
Yang, Ling [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Inst Banking & Money, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
关键词
economic influence; government type; corporate social responsibility; panel threshold model; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GROWTH; DECENTRALIZATION; GLOBALIZATION; GOVERNMENTS; COMPETITION; FEDERALISM; BOTTOM; POLICY; BIG;
D O I
10.3390/su151310694
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper uses a panel threshold model to examine the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR, hereafter) and enterprises' economic influence on regional gross domestic product (GDP, hereafter) and employment. We find that there is a threshold effect between CSR and enterprises' economic influence on regional GDP and employment in different regimes of local GDP and unemployment rates. When local GDP is low, the relationship between CSR and enterprises' economic influence on regional GDP is significantly negative; however, when local GDP is high, the relationship between the two factors is significantly positive. Meanwhile, firms employing more staff do less CSR when the local unemployment rate is higher. Furthermore, in terms of different government types, the relationship between CSR and corporate influence on regional GDP is negative in predatory and collusive governments, but not in market-leading governments, and the relationship between CSR and corporate influence on regional employment seems insignificant. The findings imply that local leading enterprises exert influence on the social responsibility rules stipulated by local governments by decreasing or increasing regional GDP and regional employment.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Stakeholder management, CSR commitment, corporate social performance: The moderating role of uncertainty in CSR regulation [J].
Adomako, Samuel ;
Mai Dong Tran .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (05) :1414-1423
[2]  
Aoki M., 2001, COMP I ANAL, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/6867.001.0001
[3]   Economic growth and its impact on environment: A panel data analysis [J].
Asici, Ahmet Atil .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 :324-333
[4]   Does income growth relocate ecological footprint? [J].
Asici, Ahmet Atli ;
Acar, Sevil .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 :707-714
[5]  
Basak B., 2006, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V5, P289
[6]  
Berman S.L., 2005, ACAD MANAGEMENT P, V2005, P1
[7]   CSR Structures: Evidence, Drivers, and Firm Value Implications [J].
Bouslah, Kais ;
Hmaittane, Abdelmajid ;
Kryzanowski, Lawrence ;
M'Zali, Bouchra .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2023, 185 (01) :115-145
[8]   Does competition for capital discipline governments? Decentralization, globalization, and public policy [J].
Cai, HB ;
Treisman, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (03) :817-830
[9]   CSR gap and firm performance: An organizational justice perspective [J].
Cao, Shaopeng ;
Yao, Hongjiang ;
Zhang, Min .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 158
[10]  
Chen Kang., 2002, China Econ. Q, V2, P111, DOI DOI 10.1002/WENE.84