Corporate social responsibility and green exploratory innovation-the moderating role of three environmental regulations

被引:52
作者
Chen, Pengyu [1 ]
Dagestani, Abd Alwahed [2 ]
Kim, SangKyum [1 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Econ, Yongin, South Korea
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; green exploratory innovation; environmental performance; mandatory regulations; market-driven regulations; voluntary regulations; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; ECO-INNOVATION; MANAGEMENT; CHINA; IMPACT; CSR; SUSTAINABILITY; EXPLOITATION; TECHNOLOGY; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2023.2196585
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Corporate social responsibility(CSR) is becoming increasingly important in the field of corporate sustainability. However, despite the growing literature on CSR, there is a paucity of empirical evidence examining external environmental pressures. This paper aims to fill this gap by exploring the relationship between CSR and green exploratory innovation from the perspective of three types of environmental regulations: mandatory, market-driven, and voluntary regulations. Using Chinese-listed companies from 2010 to 2019 as original data, we examined the impacts of CSR on green exploratory innovation of firms and the moderating effects of the three regulations using a moderating effect model. The results concluded that CSR could significantly stimulate firms to engage in green exploratory innovation. Mandatory and market-driven regulations exhibited positive moderating effects, and market-driven regulations have a greater impact on CSR strategies. In contrast, voluntary regulations showed a negative moderating effect. Our study will be of great value to companies under external environmental pressure and will provide a new path to achieve sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:3214 / 3226
页数:13
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Barriers to green innovation initiatives among manufacturers: the Malaysian case [J].
Abdullah, Mirza ;
Zailani, Suhaiza ;
Iranmanesh, Mohammad ;
Jayaraman, K. .
REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 10 (04) :683-709
[2]   Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0 [J].
Adamik, Anna ;
Nowicki, Michal .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
[3]   Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach [J].
Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier ;
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, Natalia .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) :365-385
[4]   Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Moderating Roles of Attainment Discrepancy and Organization Slack [J].
Arora, Punit ;
Dharwadkar, Ravi .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2011, 19 (02) :136-152
[5]   Environmental pressure group strength and air pollution: An empirical analysis [J].
Binder, S ;
Neumayer, E .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 55 (04) :527-538
[6]  
Borghesi S, 2008, GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY - SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, P152
[7]   The development of corporate charitable contributions in the UK: A stakeholder analysis [J].
Brammer, S ;
Millington, A .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2004, 41 (08) :1411-1434
[8]   GLOBAL INTERFIRM NETWORKS: THE DIVISION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LABOR BETWEEN MNEs AND SMEs [J].
Buckley, Peter J. ;
Prashantham, Shameen .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (01) :40-58
[9]   The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China [J].
Cai, Wugan ;
Li, Guangpei .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 176 :110-118
[10]   Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China [J].
Cheng S. ;
Lin K.Z. ;
Wong W. .
Journal of Management & Governance, 2016, 20 (3) :503-523