Rapid seismic damage assessment using machine learning methods: application to a gantry crane

被引:1
|
作者
Peng, Qihui [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Wenming [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Hongyu [3 ]
Guo, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Kang [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Technol & Equipment Rail Transit Operat & Mainten, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Gantry crane; rapid assessment; machine learning methods; random forest; support vector machine; imbalanced dataset; fragility analysis; PREDICTION; EFFICIENT; BRIDGE; CAPACITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/15732479.2021.1979600
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A timely damage state assessment of gantry cranes has a significant impact on the post-earthquake reconstruction and economic recovery in earthquake-stricken areas. This study aims to propose a methodology to rapidly predict the seismic damage states in light of nine classification-based machine learning methods. The 48 earthquake parameters is presented and of which relative importance and influence on the structural responses of the employed simple gantry crane are examined based on the data set matrix of 2760 (ground motions) x48 (earthquake parameters). Meanwhile the innovative method is proposed to mitigate the class imbalance problem in the training data. Finally, the proposed method is applied to predict the fragility of a gantry crane subjected to ground motions and the efficiency and accuracy of nine machine learning methods are compared herein. The results demonstrate that the parameter of spectral acceleration S-a at the first self-vibration period of the examined structure is of great significance to predict the accurate damage states. Random Forest, Neural Networks, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine are preferable in all selected machine learning methods hereon. And the predictive fragility curves and the fragility curves computed in FE model are consistent approximately in spite of maximum error of 7.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 792
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid seismic damage state assessment of RC frames using machine learning methods
    Zhang, Haoyou
    Cheng, Xiaowei
    Li, Yi
    He, Dianjin
    Du, Xiuli
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 65
  • [2] Rapid seismic damage-state assessment of steel moment frames using machine learning
    Nguyen, Hoang D.
    LaFave, James M.
    Lee, Young-Joo
    Shin, Myoungsu
    Engineering Structures, 2022, 252
  • [3] Rapid seismic damage-state assessment of steel moment frames using machine learning
    Nguyen, Hoang D.
    LaFave, James M.
    Lee, Young-Joo
    Shin, Myoungsu
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 252
  • [4] Rapid seismic damage evaluation of bridge portfolios using machine learning techniques
    Mangalathu, Sujith
    Hwang, Seong-Hoon
    Choi, Eunsoo
    Jeon, Jong-Su
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 201
  • [5] Rapid Seismic Damage Evaluation of Subway Stations Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Huang, Pengfei
    Ge, Hanbin
    Chen, Zhiyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2023, 20 (07)
  • [6] Machine Learning-Based Classification for Rapid Seismic Damage Assessment of Buildings at a Regional Scale
    Bhatta, Sanjeev
    Dang, Ji
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 28 (07) : 1861 - 1891
  • [7] Development of a Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment Model of Slope Using Machine Learning Methods
    Kwag, Shinyoung
    Hahm, Daegi
    Kim, Minkyu
    Eem, Seunghyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [8] Rapid Assessment of Seismic Risk for Railway Bridges Based on Machine Learning
    Huang, Yong
    He, Jing
    Zhu, Zhihui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2024, 24 (06)
  • [9] Seismic damage prediction of RC buildings using machine learning
    Bhatta, Sanjeev
    Dang, Ji
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2023, 52 (11): : 3504 - 3527
  • [10] Rapid classification of local seismic events using machine learning
    Luozhao Jia
    Hongfeng Chen
    Kang Xing
    Journal of Seismology, 2022, 26 : 897 - 912