Energy use efficiency of soil microorganisms: Driven by carbon recycling and reduction

被引:45
|
作者
Wang, Chaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Kuzyakov, Yakov [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Goettingen, Biogeochem Agroecosyst, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Land & Food Syst, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Goettingen, Dept Soil Sci Temperate Ecosyst, Dept Agr Soil Sci, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
carbon and energy availability; carbon and energy fluxes; microbial anabolism and catabolism; microbial carbon recycling; microbial growth and maintenance; soil organic matter stabilization; ORGANIC-MATTER; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; BACTERIAL-GROWTH; AMINO-ACIDS; THERMODYNAMICS; STOICHIOMETRY; DYNAMICS; BALANCE; BIOMASS; FATE;
D O I
10.1111/gcb.16925
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Carbon use efficiency (CUE) is being intensively applied to quantify carbon (C) cycling processes from microbial cell to global scales. Energy use efficiency (EUE) is at least as important as the CUE because (i) microorganisms use organic C mainly as an energy source and not as elemental C per se, and (ii) microbial growth and maintenance are limited by energy, but not by C as a structural element. We conceptualize and review the importance of EUE by soil microorganisms and focus on (i) the energy content in organic compounds depending on the nominal oxidation state of carbon (NOSC), (ii) approaches to assess EUE, (iii) similarities and differences between CUE and EUE, and (iv) discuss mechanisms responsible for lower EUE compared to CUE. The energy content per C atom (enthalpy of combustion, the total energy stored in a compound) in organic compounds is very closely (R2 = 0.98) positively related to NOSC and increases by 108 kJ mol-1 C per one NOSC unit. For the first time we assessed the NOSC of microbial biomass in soil (-0.52) and calculated the corresponding energy content of -510 kJ mol-1 C. We linked CUE and EUE considering the NOSC of microbial biomass and element compositions of substrates utilized by microorganisms. The mean microbial EUE (0.32-0.35) is 18% lower than CUE (0.41) using glucose as a substrate. This definitely indicates that microbial growth is limited by energy relative to C. Based on the comparison of a broad range of processes of C and energy utilization for cell growth and maintenance, as well as database of experimental CUE from various compounds, we clearly explained five mechanisms and main factors why EUE is lower than CUE. The two main mechanisms behind lower EUE versus CUE are: (i) microbial recycling: C can be microbially recycled, whereas energy is always utilized only once, and (ii) chemical reduction of organic and inorganic compounds: Energy is used for reduction, which is ongoing without C utilization. We linked carbon use efficiency (CUE) and energy use efficiency (EUE) considering the nominal oxidation state of carbon (NOSC) of microbial biomass and element compositions of substrates utilized by microorganisms. The mean microbial EUE (0.32-0.35) is 18% lower than CUE (0.41) using glucose as a substrate, indicating that microbial growth is limited by energy relative to C. The two main mechanisms behind lower EUE versus CUE are: (i) microbial recycling: C can be microbially recycled, whereas energy is always utilized only once, and (ii) reduction of organic and inorganic compounds that require energy investment but not C.image
引用
收藏
页码:6170 / 6187
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enhanced carbon use efficiency and warming resistance of soil microorganisms under organic amendment
    Li, Ling
    Li, Chenhua
    Guo, Hanyue
    Liu, Yunhua
    Sheng, Jiandong
    Guo, Shiwei
    Shen, Qirong
    Ling, Ning
    Guo, Junjie
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 192
  • [2] Aridity-Driven Change in Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency and Its Linkage to Soil Carbon Storage
    Pei, Junmin
    Fang, Changming
    Li, Bo
    Nie, Ming
    Li, Jinquan
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2024, 30 (11)
  • [3] A Global Assessment of Manufacturing: Economic Development, Energy Use, Carbon Emissions, and the Potential for Energy Efficiency and Materials Recycling
    Gutowski, Timothy G.
    Allwood, Julian M.
    Herrmann, Christoph
    Sahni, Sahil
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 38, 2013, 38 : 81 - 106
  • [4] Respiration and carbon use efficiency characteristics of soluble protein-derived carbon by soil microorganisms: A case study at afforested sites
    Gao, Lei
    Smith, Andrew R.
    Jones, Davey L.
    Liu, Baodong
    Guo, Yafen
    Cui, Xiaoyang
    Hill, Paul W.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2024, 188
  • [5] NITRATE REDUCTION BY SOIL MICROORGANISMS
    ILINA, GK
    KHODAKOV.RN
    MIKROBIOLOGIYA, 1973, 42 (03): : 475 - 480
  • [6] Soil microbial carbon use efficiency and the constraints
    Dang, Run
    Liu, Jian
    Lichtfouse, Eric
    Zhou, Lifeng
    Zhou, Meng
    Xiao, Leilei
    ANNALS OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 74 (01)
  • [7] Land Use, Microorganisms, and Soil Organic Carbon: Putting the Pieces Together
    Mo, Lingzi
    Zanella, Augusto
    Bolzonella, Cristian
    Squartini, Andrea
    Xu, Guo-Liang
    Banas, Damien
    Rosatti, Mauro
    Longo, Enrico
    Pindo, Massimo
    Concheri, Giuseppe
    Fritz, Ines
    Ranzani, Giulia
    Bellonzi, Marco
    Campagnolo, Marco
    Casarotto, Daniele
    Longo, Michele
    Linnyk, Vitalyi
    Ihlein, Lucas
    Yeomans, Allan James
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (08):
  • [8] Sunlight-driven recycling to increase nutrient use-efficiency in agriculture
    Perin, Giorgio
    Yunus, Ian Sofian
    Valton, Marine
    Alobwede, Emanga
    Jones, Patrik R.
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2019, 41
  • [9] REDUCTION OF INORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY SOIL MICROORGANISMS
    BAUTISTA, EM
    ALEXANDER, M
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1972, 36 (06) : 918 - 920
  • [10] Rethinking microbial carbon use efficiency in soil models
    Allison, Steven D.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2025, 15 (01) : 10 - 12