New Model to Predict Recurrence After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyps ≥ 20 mm

被引:4
作者
Cifuentes, Juan D. Gomez D. [1 ]
Berger, Scott [2 ]
Caskey, Kadon [3 ]
Jove, Andre [3 ]
Sealock, Robert [1 ]
Hair, Clark [1 ]
Velez, Maria [1 ]
Jarbrink-Sehgal, Maria [1 ]
Thrift, Aaron P. P. [4 ,5 ]
da Costa Jr, Wilson L. L. [4 ]
Gyanprakash, Ketwaroo [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Div Gastroenterol, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Internal Med Dept, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Med, Sect Epidemiol & Populat Sci, Houston, TX USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dan L Duncan Comprehens Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Endoscopic mucosal resection; Colonic polyps; Colonic polyp recurrence; Gastrointestinal endoscopy; NONPEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL LESIONS; RISK STRATIFICATION; ADENOMA RECURRENCE; RECURRING ADENOMA; FOLLOW-UP; EMR; NEOPLASIA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10620-023-08054-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPolyp recurrence is common after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of non-pedunculated colonic polyps & GE; 20 mm. Two models haven been published for polyp recurrence prediction: Sydney EMR recurrence tool (SERT) and the size, morphology, colonic site, and access to target (SMSA) score. None of these models have been evaluated in a real-world United States (U.S.) cohort. We aimed to evaluate the external validity of these two models and develop a new model.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with non-pedunculated polyps & GE; 20 mm that underwent EMR between 1/1/2012 and 6/30/2020. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of polyp recurrence to build a new model. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for the new model, SERT and a modified version of SMSA were derived and compared.ResultsA total of 461 polyps from 461 unique patients were included for analysis. The average polyp size was 29.1 & PLUSMN; 12.4 mm. Recurrence rate at first or second surveillance colonoscopy was 29.0% at a 15.6 months median follow up (IQR 12.3-17.4). A model was created with 4 variables from index colonoscopy: size > 40 mm, tubulovillous adenoma histology, right colon location and piecemeal resection. ROC curves showed that the Area Under the ROC (AUC) for the new model was 0.618, for SERT 0.538 and for mSMSA 0.550.ConclusionSERT score and mSMSA have poor external validity to predict polyp recurrence after EMR of non-pedunculated polyps > 20 mm. Our new model is simpler and performs better in this multiethnic, non-referral cohort from the U.S.
引用
收藏
页码:3935 / 3942
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The risk of residual or recurring adenoma after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps is predictable [J].
Alexandrino, Goncalo ;
Figueiredo, Maria L. ;
Domingues, Tiago D. ;
Lourenco, Luis C. ;
Carvalho, Rita ;
Martins, Alexandra .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (06) :713-717
[2]   Risk stratification of colorectal polyps for predicting residual or recurring adenoma using the Size/Morphology/Site/Access score [J].
Barosa, Rita ;
Mohammed, Noor ;
Rembacken, Bjorn .
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (04) :630-638
[3]   Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Belderbos, Tim D. G. ;
Leenders, Max ;
Moons, Leon M. G. ;
Siersema, Peter D. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (05) :388-U121
[4]  
Bick BL, 2017, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V85, pAB237, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.035
[5]  
Carvalho R, 2013, ACTA GASTRO-ENT BELG, V76, P225
[6]   Validation of the size morphology site access score in endoscopic mucosal resection of large polyps in a district general hospital [J].
Currie, A. C. ;
Merriman, H. ;
Gilani, S. Nadia shah ;
Mackenzie, P. ;
McFall, M. R. ;
Baig, M. K. .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2019, 101 (08) :558-562
[7]   Recurrence After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Early and Late Incidence, Treatment Outcomes, and Outcomes in Non-Overt (Histologic-Only) Recurrence [J].
El Rahyel, Ahmed ;
Abdullah, Noor ;
Love, Emma ;
Vemulapalli, Krishna C. ;
Rex, Douglas K. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (03) :949-+
[8]   Factors Associated With Recurrence of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma After Endoscopic Resection [J].
Facciorusso, Antonio ;
Di Maso, Marianna ;
Serviddio, Gaetano ;
Vendemiale, Gianluigi ;
Spada, Cristiano ;
Costamagna, Guido ;
Muscatiello, Nicola .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (08) :1148-+
[9]   Evolution of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) technique and the reduced recurrence of large colonic polyps from 2012 to 2020 [J].
Gomez Cifuentes, Juan D. ;
Berger, Scott ;
Caskey, Kadon ;
Jove, Andre ;
Sealock, Robert J. ;
Hair, Clark ;
Velez, Maria ;
Jarbrink-Sehgal, Maria ;
Thrift, Aaron P. ;
da Costa, Wilson ;
Gyanprakash, Ketwaroo .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 58 (04) :435-440
[10]   A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy [J].
Gupta, S. ;
Miskovic, D. ;
Bhandari, P. ;
Dolwani, S. ;
McKaig, B. ;
Pullan, R. ;
Rembacken, B. ;
Riley, S. ;
Rutter, M. D. ;
Suzuki, N. ;
Tsiamoulos, Z. ;
Valori, R. ;
Vance, M. E. ;
Faiz, O. D. ;
Saunders, B. P. ;
Thomas-Gibson, S. .
FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 4 (04) :244-248