Granting Inequities: Racialization and Gender Differences in Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada's Grant Amounts for Research Elites

被引:0
作者
Nakhaie, Reza [1 ]
Lippert, Randy K. [1 ]
Cukarski, Dobrila [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Dept Sociol & Criminol, Windsor, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Windsor, Dept Sociol, Windsor, ON, Canada
来源
CANADIAN ETHNIC STUDIES-ETUDES ETHNIQUES AU CANADA | 2023年 / 55卷 / 02期
关键词
Research grant allocations; SSHRC; inequality; vertical mosaic; racialization; higher edu-cation; Canadian society; ETHNIC-ORIGINS; WOMEN; RACE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号
0304 ; 030401 ;
摘要
This paper explores inequities in the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRCC) grant amounts awarded to successful applicants in Canada's universities. Specifically, the study seeks to discern whether ethnicity and gender matter for amounts of SSHRCC's award decisions using compiled SSHRCC data and names of successful grant applicants to generate a large sample from 1998 to 2018. Although the importance of ethnicity along with gender and region, as well as institutional factors such as discipline and status of an applicant's university are explored in relation to higher education institutions' applicants, our focus is on effects of racialization on SSHRCC's decisions. We find that several factors affect the amount of grants awarded and that racialized applicants, especially men, have tended to receive less funding than non-racialized applicants over this period. In addition, on the one hand, the grant amount for racialized minorities has decreased in recent years. On the other hand, racialized women applicants received higher grant amounts than their counterparts, and particularly in recent years. Conceptual, empirical, methodological, and policy implications of these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:176
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alba RichardD., 2003, REMAKING AM MAINSTRE
[2]   You've come a long way, baby? Persistent gender inequality in university enrolment and completion in Canada, 1979-2004 [J].
Andres, Lesley ;
Adamuti-Trache, Maria .
CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2007, 33 (01) :93-116
[3]   Evaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against? [J].
Banal-Estanol, Albert ;
Macho-Stadler, Ines ;
Perez-Castrillo, David .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (07) :1823-1840
[4]   Peer review and panel decisions in the assessment of Australian Research Council project grant applicants: what counts in a highly competitive context? [J].
Bazeley, P .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 35 (04) :435-452
[5]  
Blake M., 2000, WHO APPLIES RES FUND
[6]  
Bonikowska A., 2019, EC INSIGHTS
[7]  
CAUT (Canadian Association of University Teachers), 2018, UND UND DIV EQ CAN P
[8]  
Census, 2016, PUMF 98M0001 E 2016
[9]  
Cuneo CarlJ., 1990, PAY EQUITY LABOUR FE
[10]   The big consequences of small biases: A simulation of peer review [J].
Day, Theodore Eugene .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (06) :1266-1270