Determinants of point-of-care ultrasound lung sliding amplitude in mechanically ventilated patients

BackgroundAlthough lung sliding seen by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is known to be affected to varying degrees by different physiologic and pathologic processes, it is typically only reported qualitatively in the critical care setting. Lung sliding amplitude quantitatively expresses the amount of pleural movement seen by POCUS but its determinants in mechanically ventilated patients are largely unknown.MethodsThis was a single-center, prospective, observational pilot study examining 40 hemithoraces in 20 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Each subject had lung sliding amplitude measured in both B-mode and by pulsed wave Doppler at their bilateral lung apices and bases. Differences in lung sliding amplitude were correlated with anatomical location (apex vs base) as well as physiologic parameters including positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), driving pressure, tidal volume and the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)).ResultsPOCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex compared to the lung base in both B-mode (3.6 +/- 2.0 mm vs 8.6 +/- 4.3 mm; p < 0.001) and the pulsed wave Doppler mode (10.3 +/- 4.6 cm/s vs 13.9 +/- 5.5 cm/s; p < 0.001) corresponding to expected distribution of ventilation to the lung bases. Inter-rater reliability of B-mode measurements was excellent (ICC = 0.91) and distance traversed in B-mode had a significant positive correlation with pleural line velocity (r(2) = 0.32; p < 0.001). There was a non-statistically significant trend towards lower lung sliding amplitude for PEEP >= 10 cmH(2)O, as well as for driving pressure >= 15 cmH(2)O in both ultrasound modes.ConclusionPOCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex than the lung base in mechanically ventilated patients. This was true when using both B-mode and pulsed wave Doppler. Lung sliding amplitude did not correlate with PEEP, driving pressure, tidal volume or PaO2:FiO(2) ratio. Our findings suggest that lung sliding amplitude can be quantified in mechanically ventilated patients in a physiologically predictable way and with high inter-rater reliability. A better understanding of POCUS derived lung sliding amplitude and its determinants may aid in the more accurate diagnosis of lung pathologies, including pneumothorax, and could serve as a means of further reducing radiation exposure and improving outcomes in critically ill patients.