Defining and measuring family: Lessons learned from LGBTQ plus people and families

被引:5
作者
Fish, Jessica N. [1 ,2 ]
Reczek, Rin [3 ]
Ezra, Pond [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Family Sci, College Pk, MD 20010 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Sociol, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
family policy; family structure; gay; lesbian; bisexual; transgender; inequality; kinship; social networks; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; CONSENSUAL NONMONOGAMY; AMERICAN FAMILY; PARENT FAMILIES; YOUNG-ADULTS; GENDER; GAY; HEALTH; PERSPECTIVES; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1111/jomf.12987
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: This essay discusses the challenges and opportunities of defining family in the context of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) people. Background: LGBTQ+ people and their families remain at the forefront of novel family scholarship. Interrogating methodological approaches to defining family are critical for overcoming the continued marginalization and misrepresentation of LGBTQ+ family scholarship. Method: We review and present select literature to frame the current challenges and subsequent opportunities for advancing LGBTQ+ family scholarship through the conceptual and methodological defining of family. Results: Framed in a U.S. context, we discuss the oppressive and emancipatory consequences that have occurred through the project of defining family. We then highlight current challenges of defining LGBTQ+ families, emphasizing data inclusion and measurement considerations that arise when grappling with the methodological complexities of LGBTQ+ people versus LGBTQ+ families, chosen families and fictive kin, LGBTQ+ children in families, and consensually non-monogamous relationships. Throughout, we present opportunities to address current shortcomings within family scholarship regarding LGBTQ+ families. We end with clear and pointed steps on how family researchers can integrate practical but nevertheless influential strategies to advance and enrich LGBTQ+ family research through intentional reflections on research design, sampling, and measurement. Conclusion: Despite progress, family scholarship alongside current social events entreats a more intentional commitment from family scholars to measure and advocate for data and methods that properly illuminate (LGBTQ+) family life.
引用
收藏
页码:1450 / 1467
页数:18
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   Impact of Gender-Affirming Care Bans on Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth: Parental Figures' Perspective [J].
Abreu, Roberto L. ;
Sostre, Jules P. ;
Gonzalez, Kirsten A. ;
Lockett, Gabriel M. ;
Matsuno, Em ;
Mosley, Della, V .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 36 (05) :643-652
[2]  
Acosta K. L., 2021, QUEER STEPFAMILIES P
[3]   A conscious and inclusive family studies [J].
Allen, KR .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2000, 62 (01) :4-17
[4]   Hegemonic Heteronormativity: Toward a New Era of Queer Family Theory [J].
Allen, Samuel H. ;
Mendez, Shawn N. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY THEORY & REVIEW, 2018, 10 (01) :70-86
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Trans Kids: Being Gendered in the TwentyFirst Century
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, REV ORDINANCES
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Mapping Attacks on LGBTQ Rights in U.S. State Legislatures in 2024
[8]   Constructing Home and Family: How the Ballroom Community Supports African American GLBTQ Youth in the Face of HIV/AIDS [J].
Arnold, Emily A. ;
Bailey, Marlon M. .
JOURNAL OF GAY & LESBIAN SOCIAL SERVICES, 2009, 21 (2-3) :171-188
[9]  
Badgett M.V. L., 2019, LGBT POVERTY US STUD
[10]  
Bailey MarlonM., 2013, BUTCH QUEENS PUMPS G