Disparities in Outcomes Between Sexes in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Treated with TEVAR

被引:1
|
作者
Yammine, Halim [1 ,2 ]
Briggs, Charles S. [1 ]
Frederick, John R. [1 ]
Stanley, Gregory [1 ]
Soto, Hector Crespo [1 ]
Nussbaum, Tzvi [1 ]
Madjarov, Jeko M. [1 ]
Arko III, Frank R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Atrium Hlth, Sanger Heart & Vasc Inst, Charlotte, NC USA
[2] Sanger Heart Inst, Atrium Hlth, 1237 Harding Pl,Suite 4400, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA
关键词
ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR; TERM OUTCOMES; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; GENDER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To evaluate differences in presentation and outcomes between sexes in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). Methods: Between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2017 186 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for TBAD at a single institution. Men (n = 112) and women (n = 74) were compared based on presenting demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. Results: Women were older (P = 0.04) and had a lower body mass index (P = 0.03). More women (F) presented with continued pain or refractory hypertension (51.0% F, 30.0% M), while more men (M) presented with acute complicated dissections (19.0% F, 39.0% M) (P = 0.008). At presentation, women had statistically higher relative rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.03), and smoking (P = 0.03). Significantly more women were on Medicare without Medicaid (55.0% F, 34.0% M), while men had private insurance (35.0% F, 13.0% M) (P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in blood pressure control at presentation, discharge, or at 30 days. When normalized by P = 0.0002), as well as proportionally larger true lumens at the left subclavian artery (14.9(2.90)F, 13.4(2.50)M, P = 0.0002), carina (12.6(5.80)F, 9.90(4.80)M, P = 0.0009), and celiac (10.5(4.50)F, 8.50(4.10)M, P = 0.006) levels, and at the largest point of dissection (11.6(6.50)F, 9.60(4.80)M, P = 0.04), as well as proportionately smaller false lumens at the carina (5.90(5.60)F, 9.30(6.10)M, P = 0.003). Despite not being statistically significant, women had lower rates of stroke (6.80% F, 8.00% M, P = 0.7) and acute kidney injury (5.40% F, 11.6% M, P = 0.2), as well fewer days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.20(4.30)F, 4.60(6.60)M, P = 0.2) and an overall shorter length of stay (6.80(6.70)F, 8.00(8.20)M, P = 0.5). Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival for women versus men were 96.0% vs. 92.0%, 90.0% vs. 79.0%, and 70.0% vs. 69.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.042). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from reintervention for women versus men were 89.0% vs. 90.0%, 58.0% vs. 72.0%, and 48.0% vs. 58.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.13). Conclusions: Women present with TBAD at an older age, have more comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and have larger ascending aortic diameters for their size. Despite having less severe dissections as evidenced by smaller false lumens and wider true lumens, it does not appear that this correlates with improved outcomes for women when compared to men. It appears that this is one of the few, if not only, aortic pathologies that result in comparable outcomes between sexes.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 232
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Secondary aortic intervention may not impair survival in patients treated with TEVAR for type B aortic dissection: A Finnish national registry study
    Juhana, Toimela
    Marja, Hedman
    Tuomas, Selander
    Annastiina, Husso
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025,
  • [2] Ethnic disparities in outcomes of patients with complicated type B aortic dissection
    Yammine, Halim
    Ballast, Jocelyn K.
    Anderson, William E.
    Frederick, John R.
    Briggs, Charles S.
    Roush, Timothy
    Madjarov, Jeko M.
    Nussbaum, Tzvi
    Sibille, Joshua A.
    Arko, Frank R., III
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (01) : 36 - 45
  • [3] TEVAR for type B aortic dissection in Japan
    Usui A.
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014, 62 (5) : 282 - 289
  • [4] TEVAR for high risk patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a paradigm shift
    Shah, Aamir
    Gupta, Navyash
    Gewertz, Bruce L.
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 27 (01): : 26 - 37
  • [5] Preoperative Predictors of Late Aortic Expansion in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Treated with TEVAR
    Dong, Zhiqiang
    Yang, He
    Li, Gang
    Xu, Xinyang
    Liu, Hong
    Gu, Jiaxi
    Li, Minghui
    Gu, Weidong
    Shao, Yongfeng
    Ni, Buqing
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [6] Updates on Indications for TEVAR in Type B Aortic Dissection
    Malaisrie, S. Chris
    Mehta, Christopher K.
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 15 (06) : 495 - 501
  • [7] Improving risk prediction in patients undergoing TEVAR for Type B Aortic dissection
    Janosi, Rolf Alexander
    Rassaf, Tienush
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 303 : 74 - 75
  • [8] The new indication of TEVAR for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection
    Song, Chao
    Lu, Qingsheng
    Zhou, Jian
    Yu, Guanyu
    Feng, Xiang
    Zhao, Zhiqing
    Bao, Junmin
    Feng, Rui
    Jing, Zaiping
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (25)
  • [9] Is TEVAR really needed for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection?
    Tan, Sven Zhen Cian Patrick
    El Santawy, Hazem
    Abdelhaliem, Amr
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (10) : 3831 - 3833
  • [10] Fit patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection with dilated aorta should have TEVAR: a review
    De Rango, P.
    Safi, H. J.
    Estrera, A. L.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 16 (02): : 107 - 116